Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Geometric Mean And Trickery

Consider a transition from ninf,

EΔh1=mc21aψi(aψfaψi)

Consider another transition from aψf+aψiaψf,  (This is an extrapolation, it is not proven that aψf+aψi is a solution.)

EΔh2=mc2aψf+aψi(aψf(aψf+aψi))=mc2aψf+aψi(aψi)

such that, aψi is in between the paths of EΔh1 and EΔh2.

If we take the geometric mean of the two,

E¯Δh=EΔh1.EΔh2=mc2aψiaψfaψf+aψi

and let

Eo=E¯Δhaψi=mc21aψiaψiaψfaψf+aψi  Jm-1

We have an expression for Eo.  A negative sign is necessary because a change from a higher value of aψ to a lower value of aψ (ie. a positive value of (aψiaψf) ) results in a loss of energy.

Note:  If,

EΔhf=2πaψfmc.f

EΔhi=2πaψimc.f

And,

EΔhi+EΔhf=2πaψimc.f+2πaψfmc.f

2π(aψi+aψf)mc.f=EΔhi+f

And,

EΔhi+f=mc2aψf+aψi(aψf(aψf+aψi)) --- (*)

This does not proof that aψf+aψi is a solution to x for ψ but it shows that (*) is a valid expression.