Tvp=v2boom∗molarmass∗10−32∗8.3144
Tvp=32Tboom
In the case of MgO3Ti with, Zm=22+12+8∗3=58 a density of 3.36gcm−3 and molar mass of 120.17gmol−1. Its Tvp is,
vboom=3.4354∗336058=199.01
Tvp=199.012∗120.17∗10−32∗8.3144=286.21K or 13.06oC
For ZnTiO3,
Tvp=32∗354.41=531.62K or 258.46oC
For TiCaO3,
Tvp=32∗354.41=531.62K or 258.46oC
For TiCaO3,
350.91K<Tvp<402.0K or 77.76oC<Tvp<128.85oC
For FeTiO3,
458.79K<Tvp<476.50K or 185.64oC<Tvp<203.36oC
For MnTiO3,
Tvp=437.01K or 163.83oC
It seems that only by reducing the density of high value Tvp perozskites can Tvp at room temperature be achieved. For example a 82.60% MnTiO3 has a Tvp of
Tvp=0.82602∗437.01=298.16K or 25.01oC
The rest of the 100%, 17.40% can be with Fe, FeTiO3, as long as they can form into the same crystal structure.
The rest of the 100%, 17.40% can be with Fe, FeTiO3, as long as they can form into the same crystal structure.
Reducing density can only reduce Tvp; Tvp cannot be increased this way. Density can only be reduced given a crystalline structure.
It is likely that vp provides the most number of freed particles that will act as charge carriers. Super-superconductor...The difference between vp and vrms is,
vp=√23vrms=0.667vrms
vp should be used instead of vrms; we should set vp=√2RTnMm=vboom≠vrms such that T=Tboom.
And it rains again...
vp=√23vrms=0.667vrms
vp should be used instead of vrms; we should set vp=√2RTnMm=vboom≠vrms such that T=Tboom.
And it rains again...