
What's more exponential than eT? eT2, eTT?
Temperature squared, Temp2 is not enough.
Data for the following graph was not printable. TT was too big. Although the graph was still presented by the spreadsheet program. The graph is just a series of data points from 1 to 15 on the x axis.
Temperature to the power of temperature. Which make 00=1 a testable reality. But
ln(n)=1 makes n=e=2.718
Is this the minimum n for Bose-Einstein condensate? ⌊n⌋=2?
For any other n, Temp≠0; temperature simply cannot be zero. This suggests that Absolute Zero is attainable only with a pair of particles. We have not considered the gradient and y-intercept of the regression line.
If the gradient is A and the y-intercept is C then,
ln(n0)=A.00+C, n0=eA+C
which could be any number. We are still in trouble if Absolute Zero is achievable only with a specific number of particles.
Goodnight.