...an idiot because,
Tk=r∗TTg
where r=qgεgkΔT
when
Tg=ρgεg=ρcεc=T
as measured on the inner wall of the containment.
TTg=1
and so,
Tk=r
but,
ΔT=Tg−T=0
and so,
Tk=qgεgkΔT→∞
What went wrong?
T=ρgεg=ρcεc
but
ρcεc≠ρg,P→∞εg
in the volume Vm, the temperature charge did not all move to the surface. If they did, the surface density will be numerically the same as volume density. What then is the point of Vm or r=3?
T=ρcεc=ρgεg=rhovεg
as P→∞
such that T now measures the temperature of the volume Vm with a certain volume temperature charge density and not just its surface temperature charge.
It seems that pressure must still be high, and we can be off by a factor as much as 3. The change in size V→Vm simply removes the factor 13 from the expression,
r=qg3εgkΔT
to obtain,
r=qgεgkΔT
the assumption of high pressure remains. The price of this 3 is a big volume.
Have a nice day.