Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Match Making Kinetic Theory And Temperature Particles

How do Kinetic Theory of gasses and temperature particles coexist?

Consider a confinement of particles,


Given the surface density of temperature particle on the inner surface of the containment, collisions of the gas on the containment inner wall result in an exchange of temperature particles.  The gas carries a certain amount of temperature particles and on the wall there is a certain amount of temperature particle.

The pressure of the gas dictates the efficiency of this temperature particle exchange.

There are more temperature particles with the gas than on the wall of the containment.  Posted previously, temperature particles are caught in orbit around electron orbits (post "Not To Be taken Too Seriously, Please" dated 15 May 2016).

If the gas was a solid in thermal contact with the containment,

ρcεc=ρgεg --- (**)

where ρ's are the respective temperature charge density, and ε's are the equivalents of dielectric constants.

But the gas is not in full contact with the containment wall.  The gas is in contact with the inner wall due to its pressure.  Given infinite pressure, the frequency of collision is so great that it is as if all the gas particles are in contact with the inner wall.

nNaAqg=ρg,P

n the number of moles of gas, NA Avogadro's number, A area of the inner wall, qg the number of temperature particles caught in electron orbits per particle of gas.  And ρgP, the surface charge density of the gas when its pressure is infinite, hypothetically.

Q=nNaqg

where Q is the total amount of temperature particles in the gas.  qg is the temperature of the gas particle.  nNA is the total number of gas particles in the containment.

When pressure is zero, hypothetically,

ρg,P=0=0

the charge density presented by the gas is also zero.  It is as if the gas is not in contact with the inner wall.

What charge density is between zero pressure and infinite pressure?

We shall try,

ρcεc=ρg,PεgP1+P --- (+)

ρcεc(1+P)=ρg,PεgP

ρcεc+ρcεcP=ρg,PεgP

we have,

T=ΔTP --- (*)

where ΔT=ρg,Pεgρcεc  and

T=ρcεc

this is temperature measured.

But P=nRTkV=ρnkTk

where ρn=nNAV is the number density of the gas in the volume V.

T=ΔTρnkTk

where T is the temperature of the gas as measured, and Tk is the temperature of the gas calculated from Kinetic Theory of gases.

There is of course no reason for the expression 

X=P1+P

except that,

X|P=1  

X|P=0=0

and P is linear after expansion, in the expression (*).

Does T=ΔTρnkTk make sense?

Let Tg=ρg,Pεg

with

T=ρcεc

T(1+ρnkTk)=TgρnkTk 

T=TgρnkTk1+ρnkTk 

so, Tk

T=Tg

which is the same as (**), as if the gas is a solid at full thermal contact with the containment inner wall.

What is Tg=ρg,Pεg?

Consider,

n43π(1)3

and

n4π(1)2

for n43π(1)3n4π(1)2

we have to introduce a factor 13.  ie,

3ρA=ρn

as P

So,

T=ΔTρnkTk=ΔT3ρAkTk

Since,

Tg=ρg,Pεg=ρAqgεg

T=3ΔTTgεgkTkqg

TTg=ΔT3εgkTkqg

where ΔT=TgT is the result of assuming,

ρcεc=ρg,PεgP1+P 

It is the result of how temperature is measured.

Tg is hypothetical but a constant given a volume of gas with a given amount of temperature particles.

3εgk is a constant, if εg exist.

If the gas is a solid, Tg is just the particle temperature of the gas given qgqg like electric charges on a conductor spread over the surface of the conductor.  But Tk will not make sense, unless the temperature particles behave like a gas in the solid.

Tk=TTgqg3εgkΔT

where qg exert a field in space r and ΔT is the temperature potential across the gas-containment boundary.  Let,

ΔT=qg3εgkr

r is the distance moved to provide for a potential change of ΔT in the presence of qg.

Tg

is temperature, if the gas is a solid imbue with qg amount of temperature particles per gas particle; a total amount of Q temperature charges.

So,

Tk=rTTg

Kinetic temperature is the moment of the measured temperature per temperature as a solid.  

What is 3εgk, where 3 has a unit of per meter?

Have nice day?