Processing math: 100%

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Why? Why? Tell Me Why?

From the post "Less Mass But No Theoretical Mass" and "Two Types Of Photons" we have,

mpo=m or equivalently,

mρpo=mρ

mρec2=mρc2xa0ψdx=mρpoc2xa0ψdx=mρpoc22xz0ψdx

and

mρphc2=mρc2xa0ψdx=0

mρc2=xa0ψdx

In general from the post "We Still Have A Probelm",

mρparticlec2+xa0ψdx=mρc2=mρpoc2

which is of course an assumption that all particles is due to a common manifestation.  In which case, there is one value of mρ and the value of xa=2xz, determines what type of particle we have.

mρparticlec2+2xz0ψdx=mρpoc2

Why mρpo and why xz?  Why do these parameters (mass densities, mρx), take on the values that they do?

mρparticle+1c22xz0ψdx=mρpo

From symmetry about x=xz

mρparticle+2c2xz0ψdx=mρpo

When this mass is fully manifested as ψ, we have a photon,

Eρph=2xz0ψdx=mρpoc2=constant!

where mρpo is the mass density of a proton and Eρph, the energy density of the photon.

Which, strangely, is consistent with the photons being particles in a helical path, where their kinetic energy is,

KE=12mphc2+12mphc2=mphc2

What happens to photoelectric effects?  r the radius of the helical path changes inversely with frequency f.

2πrf=c,    2πr=λ=cf

A smaller r pushes the electron further towards the nucleus and is ejected with greater velocity after the photon passes.  This means r is inversely proportional to E, the energy of the ejected electron (from the post "Miss e- Miss e- Not").  And so,

Ef

Still, why mρpo and why xz?  Why do these parameters (mass densities, mρx), take on the values that they do?