From the post "Less Mass But No Theoretical Mass" and "Two Types Of Photons" we have,
mpo=m or equivalently,
mρpo=mρ
mρec2=mρc2−∫xa0ψdx=mρpoc2−∫xa0ψdx=mρpoc2−∫2xz0ψdx
and
mρphc2=mρc2−∫xa0ψdx=0
mρc2=∫xa0ψdx
In general from the post "We Still Have A Probelm",
mρparticlec2+∫xa0ψdx=mρc2=mρpoc2
which is of course an assumption that all particles is due to a common manifestation. In which case, there is one value of mρ and the value of xa=2xz, determines what type of particle we have.
mρparticlec2+∫2xz0ψdx=mρpoc2
Why mρpo and why xz? Why do these parameters (mass densities, mρx), take on the values that they do?
mρparticle+1c2∫2xz0ψdx=mρpo
From symmetry about x=xz
mρparticle+2c2∫xz0ψdx=mρpo
When this mass is fully manifested as ψ, we have a photon,
Eρph=∫2xz0ψdx=mρpoc2=constant!
where mρpo is the mass density of a proton and Eρph, the energy density of the photon.
Which, strangely, is consistent with the photons being particles in a helical path, where their kinetic energy is,
KE=12mphc2+12mphc2=mphc2
What happens to photoelectric effects? r the radius of the helical path changes inversely with frequency f.
2πrf=c, 2πr=λ=cf
A smaller r pushes the electron further towards the nucleus and is ejected with greater velocity after the photon passes. This means r is inversely proportional to E, the energy of the ejected electron (from the post "Miss e- Miss e- Not"). And so,
E∝f
Still, why mρpo and why xz? Why do these parameters (mass densities, mρx), take on the values that they do?