As,
\(\psi=e^{-iwt}\)
is also a solution for the wave equation of \(\psi\). The particle that provides
\(g_B =-i\cfrac { \partial \, g }{ \partial x^{ ' } }\)
can travel down the negative gravitational time axis.
Just as a charge travelling down the negative charge time axis behave like an opposite charge, a mass with negative gravitational time velocity has negative mass. As negative and positive charge pair are matter/anti-matter pair, positive mass and negative mass are also matter/anti-matter pair.
More importantly, negative charges revolved around a positively charged nucleus to form elements of the periodic table, in a similar way, masses revolves around an anti-mass nucleus to form basic elements.
If electron clouds are due to the interference of \(\psi\) waves then mass/anti-mass elements are indistinguishable from charge elements as far as X-ray diffraction is concerned.
But when mass/anti-mass elements are equivalently ionized, ie. the revolving mass ejected from the anti-mass nucleus, the ejected particle is neutral to an electrostatic field and reacts only to gravity.
It is expected that mass/anti-mass elements interact with photons in the same way and manifest photoelectric effects.
Mass/anti-mass elements will bond with other mass/anti-mass elements forming mass/anti-mass molecules. Since gravitational force is much weaker force than electrostatic force, we would expect such bonding to be much weaker. This could be the difference between ionic bonds and covalent bonds. That ionic bonds are gravitational attraction (\(F_{gB}\)) as the result of sharing of orbiting masses between anti-mass nucleus; and covalent bonds are magnetic attraction as the result of sharing of orbiting charges between oppositely charged nucleus.
Does these mass/anti-mass elements exist? They are expected to be nucleus heavy elements that forms weak molecular bonds.
Maybe masses/anti-masses, and positive charges/negative charges exist in a mixture but the electrostatic force dominates. So there can be positively or negatively charged anti-masses, just as there are positively and negatively charged masses. A total of four varieties. The periodic table will have to be reorganized and simplified further.
Radioactive elements, could be the heavy mass/anti-mass elements postulated, in slow decay. That would explain where radioactive energy comes from; that the anti-mass nucleus encounters a mass particle like an electron and matter/anti-matter annihilation occurs resulting in the release of an anti-matter particle and the acquisition of a negative charge. The weak gravitational force cannot repel the fast moving electron to avoid a collision.
But what happens to the charge when a mass/anti-mass is destroyed? Or does the charge/opposite charge be reduced to zero first, always; which then leaves behind a neutral mass. As the case of a neutron. What would a charge without mass be like? A photon? And so by analogy, an anti-photon?
The existence of mass/anti-mass will actually explains radioactivity, strong and weak molecular bonds, photon as charge without mass and anti-photon as opposite charge without mass.
An aqueous ionic solution is neutral and the charged ions does not separate into two layers even on the application of an electric field via electrodes. But the ionic elements can be removed from the solution and be purified via electrolysis. This means the mass orbiting around an anti-mass nucleus can be replaced with a charged mass. The element then become charged and we have a static charge on a metal! This might explain electric conductivity. Which means not just heavy elements (the f-block) are candidates for mass/anti-mass elements but the d-block elements in the periodic table are also mass/anti-mass elements.
And the periodic table splits into two camps: mass/anti-mass elements and charge/opposite charge elements. But the two camps can react with each other...
The mass/anti-mass elements having acquired an electron (a mass) in orbit around its anti-mass nucleus can now react with other charge elements. Together they will from covalent bonds. So, there are three types of covalent bond, those between two charge elements, those between a charge element and a mass/anti-mass element that has acquired an electron around its anti-mass nucleus, and those between two mass/anti-mass elements that have both acquired an electron. (Orbiting electrons are attracted to each other like parallel current carrying wires). It is likely that the last two types cannot be differentiated as far as breakage energy is concerned (energy to pull apart two masses in orbit), and so, we have two types of covalent bond, a strong and a weak. The weak covalent bond is just like an ionic bond where the energy required to break the bond is the energy required to pull two orbiting masses attracted to each other by the gravitational force due to \(|g_{B}|=\pi |g|\).
How's that for a tail spin.
