Shifty Tanh(x) And Consistency

From the posts "Not Exponential, But Hyperbolic And Positive Gravity!" and "Flux It", $F$ due to the particles travelling as a wave in two time dimensions ($t_g$ and $t_c$) and one space dimension that manifest the field phenomenon without the particle moving in space in our 3D space/time $t$ dimension,

$F=i\cfrac{\sqrt { 2{ mc^{ 2 } } }}{12\pi x}\,G.tanh\left( \cfrac { G }{ \sqrt { 2{ mc^{ 2 } } }  } (x-x_z) \right)$

=================================================================
Note 26 May 2015:  This equation is wrong.  Please refer to post "Opps! Lucky Me" and "Wrong, Wrong Wrong" both dated 25 May 2015.  Instead,

$F=\int{F_\rho}\,d\,x$

=================================================================
where $x_z$ is the constant of integration after a second and last integration, the specific value of $x_z$ can account for why particles in the same direction along the $t_g$ time axis attract each other but particles in the same direction along the $t_c$ time axis repel each other.  Plots of $F$ with $x_z=0$, $x_z=-1$ and $x_z=+1$ is shown below,

A positive $x_z$ results in a attractive force such as gravity and a negative $x_z$ results in a repulsive force that does not cross into the negative values of $F$.  A zoomed view of the two types of forces are plotted below

Now we have a consistent view for both gravity and the electrostatic force.  Except for the fact that, the attractive force turns repulsive before its approach to zero as $x\rightarrow\infty$, which needs further verification.

With the new wave equation from the post "My Own Wave Equation",

$\ddot { x } \left( 2-i\cfrac { \dot { x }  }{ c }  \right) \cfrac { \partial \, \psi  }{ \partial \, t_{ c } } =ic\left( 1+i\cfrac { \dot { x }  }{ c }  \right) \dot { x } ^{ 2 }\cfrac { \partial ^{ 2 }\psi  }{ \partial \, x^{ 2 } } +2\ddot { x } \cfrac { \partial V\,  }{ \partial \, t_{ c } }$

we also have MY VERY OWN UNIFIED THEORY!