Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Séance Won't Help...

If,

mev2re=Av2+FLeFLpFT

FT=TeTn4πτor2e

FLe=πn1i=1q24πεor2ei=n1i=1q24εor2ei

FLp=πnq24πεor2e=nq24εor2e

the quadratic equation or  re  becomes,

(Av2+n1i=1q24εor2ei)r2emev2renq24εoTeTn4πτo=0

(Av2+n1i=1q24εor2ei)r2emev2re14{nq2εo+TeTnπτo}=0

The y-intercept is negative always.

If we rearrange the terms again,

Av2r2emev2re+14{n1i=1q2εor2eir2enq2εoTeTnπτo}=0

We may get a zero intercept and even a double root, but the term,

n1i=1q2εor2eir2e

that appears as part of the y-intercept is really awkward and wrong.

There is only one thing to do, summon the spirit of Newton,

mev2re=Av2+FLe+FGFLpFT

FG=Gn.mpmer2e

(Av2+n1i=1q24εor2ei)r2emev2re+14{4nGmpmenq2εoTeTnπτo}=0

then the y-intercept can be zero, positive to allow for two roots of  re  and even positive enough to result in a double root.

If we put in the numbers,  however, it seems that we need a positive attractive force desperately.