qεo=4πa2ψm.2c2ln(cosh(π))
where we generalized to
qεo=4πa2ψm.2c2ln(cosh(G√2mc2aψ))
ln(cosh(G√2mc2aψc))=14
and a big particle,
ln(cosh(G√2mc2aψπ))=1
The charge of a basic particle and a big particle differ by a factor of 14.
So, in the post "And They Danced" dated 18 Jul 2016,
14q24πεor2e=v.mev2re
the new factor 14 still cancels in the ratios of mass and orbital radii derived here,
rpre=mev3empv3p
But as we rearrange,
q24πεor2e=v.4mev2re
me→4me
because we have assumed that the electric charge on a electron in orbit is the same as the electric charge of a free electron. If the experimenter has also made the same assumption, this would introduce a factor of four to the quoted experiment value of the mass of electron. The quoted mass of an electron is,
me=14m′e
where m′e is the value for electron mass used here.
The published result of the ratio of electron mass to proton mass is,
memp=11836.15267389
If we replace c with 2πc as the electron is in circular motion, the expression
q24πεore=mec3
from the post "And They Danced" dated 18 Jul 2016, becomes
q24πεore=me(2πc)3
When we associated the extra factor with me,
q24πεore=(2π)3me.c3
me→(2π)3me
The missing factor of 2π accounts for circular motion. This factor cancels as we take the ratio, but if the experiment to obtain the mass of an electron is based on linear speed, the factor of 2π for circular motion will reduce mass by a factor of (2π)3 here.
me=(2π)3m′e
Since the proton as the nucleus is in spin, and we consider its rotational kinetic energy with the use of moment of inertia, I
I=12(25m)r2ω2=12(25m)v2
m→25m
we introduced the factor 25 to the mass of the proton, mp. The actual mass should be
mp=52m′p
where m′p is the value for proton mass used here.
mef3empf3p=r4pr4e
and,
memp=177
with the following adjustments,
me→14me
due to the assumption that the particles have the same charge magnitude. And
mp→52mp
due to the use of mass instead of moment of inertia as the proton is in spin.
And also, for linear speed as opposite to circular motion,
me→(2π)3me
memp→14me(2π)352mp=177
memp=177∗(2π)3∗25∗14
or
mpme=77∗(2π)3∗25∗14=1909.98
and if we have,
memp=174
mpme=74∗(2π)3∗25∗14=1835.57
and if,
memp=175
mpme=75∗(2π)3∗25∗14=1860.37
and if,
memp=176
mpme=76∗(2π)3∗25∗14=1885.18
Which seems to adjust for the experimental value of the ratio of proton to electron mass, but the introduction of moment of inertia adds complications to the original expression,
mef3empf3p=r4pr4e→Ief3eIpf3p=r4pr4e
where Ie and Ip are moment of inertia of the electron and proton respectively.
Lunch time!