Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js

Monday, May 9, 2016

Emmy Noether II

From the post "Emmy Noether" dated 6 Jul 2015,

Consider again energy mv2 imparted onto a particle, a portion, p of which is loss due to entanglement,

Eloss=mv2p

Since this particles exist in the time dimension t, and are travelling along time t, the hypothetical force resulting in Eloss is given by,

Fdrag=dElossdx=dElossdt=2vmpdvdt

If,

F=mdvdt

then

Fdrag=2vpF

At terminal velocity v=c, the total force on the particle is zero,

F=FFdrag=F2cpF=0

this implies,

2cp=1

The portion p of energy loss is,

p=12c

which is,

p=0.0000000016678205

This is essentially the results are before.

If the particles are uniform, all have a fractional entanglement of p, then the total number of particle entangled is, N

N=1p=2c

But if the particles are not uniformly distributed, but Gaussian


but we adjust the total population of the random variable px as,

Npx=N.σ2π

Each instance of px, in the Gaussian distribution represents entanglement between two particles, so

NG=Npx2=2N.σ2π

This is the total population of px along one direction, the total population of px in a sphere, in 3D space is,

Av=43π(NG)3=43π(2N.σ2π)3

Av=323(2)3/2(π)5/2(N.σ)3

But what is σ??

If  Av is the Avogadro's constant in kg then,

Av=6.022140e26

in 1000g.  So,

6.022140e26=323(2)3/2(π)5/2(2299792458.σ)3

where N=2c

σ=0.1743

What is the significant of σ?  Firstly, 0px1 but p<σ, the spread of px is within
one standard deviation, 1σ.  More correctly, Gaussian is a bad fit for the distribution of px, Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution or Poisson distribution would be considered next.

Win some, Lose some.