From the post "Emmy Noether" dated 6 Jul 2015,
Consider again energy mv2 imparted onto a particle, a portion, p of which is loss due to entanglement,
Eloss=mv2p
Since this particles exist in the time dimension t, and are travelling along time t, the hypothetical force resulting in Eloss is given by,
Fdrag=−dElossdx=−dElossdt=−2vmpdvdt
If,
F=mdvdt
then
Fdrag=−2vpF
At terminal velocity v=c, the total force on the particle is zero,
∑F=F−Fdrag=F−2cpF=0
this implies,
2cp=1
The portion p of energy loss is,
p=12c
which is,
p=0.0000000016678205
This is essentially the results are before.
If the particles are uniform, all have a fractional entanglement of p, then the total number of particle entangled is, N
N=1p=2c
But if the particles are not uniformly distributed, but Gaussian
but we adjust the total population of the random variable px as,
Npx=N.σ√2π
Each instance of px, in the Gaussian distribution represents entanglement between two particles, so
NG=Npx∗2=2N.σ√2π
This is the total population of px along one direction, the total population of px in a sphere, in 3D space is,
Av=43π(NG)3=43π(2N.σ√2π)3
Av=323(2)3/2(π)5/2(N.σ)3
But what is σ??
If Av is the Avogadro's constant in kg then,
Av=6.022140e26
in 1000g. So,
6.022140e26=323(2)3/2(π)5/2(2∗299792458.σ)3
where N=2c
σ=0.1743
What is the significant of σ? Firstly, 0≤px≤1 but p<σ, the spread of px is within
one standard deviation, 1σ. More correctly, Gaussian is a bad fit for the distribution of px, Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution or Poisson distribution would be considered next.
Win some, Lose some.