[\(T^{+}\), \(T^{-}\)], \(T^{-}\) spins around \(T^{+}\). \(T^{+}\) spins about a smaller radius and acts as the first particle in the nucleus set,
([\(T^{+}\), \(T^{-}\)], \(p^+\), \(g^+\)).
It may also be possible that \(T^{-}\) spinning establishes a weak \(g\) field that attracts a \(g^{+}\) in which case we have,
[\(p^{+}\), \(e^{-}\)], \(e^{-}\) spins around \(p^{+}\). \(p^{+}\) spins about a smaller radius and acts as the first particle in the nucleus set,
([\(p^{+}\), \(e^{-}\)], \(g^+\), \(T^+\)).
It may be possible that \(e^{-}\) spinning establishes a weak \(B\) field that attracts a \(T^{+}\) in which case we have,
(\(p^{+}\), \(e^{-}\), \(T^+\), \(p^{+}\), \(g^+\))
and
[\(g^{+}\), \(g^{-}\)] spins around \(g^{+}\). \(g^{+}\) spins about a smaller radius and acts as the first particle in the nucleus set,
([\(g^{+}\), \(g^{-}\)], \(T^+\), \(p^{+}\)).
It may be possible that \(g^{-}\) spinning establishes a weak \(E\) field that attracts a \(p^{+}\) in which case we have,
(\(g^{+}\), \(g^{-}\), \(p^{+}\), \(g^+\), \(T^+\))
Such variations may account for nuclei phenomenon at the center of the nucleus; Issues of unexplained attraction and love.
Please note that the interaction within [\(p^{+}\), \(e^{-}\)], is not weak field interaction. As with any inter-layer negative particle,
(\(T^+\), [\(p^{+}\), \(e^{-}\)], \(g^{+}\))
the particle \(e^{-}\) puts more distance between \(p^{+}\) and \(g^{+}\). Or
(\(T^+\), \(p^{+}\), \(e^{-}\), \(T^{+}\))
where \(e^{+}\) via its weak field captures a \(T^{+}\).
And suddenly, life is unpredictable with so much love.
Prevailing science would insist on weak interactions within the nucleus such that the charge of the nucleus is the atomic number and is also the number of protons in the nucleus. The presence of an electron, ie. non weak interaction, reduces the net charge of the nucleus. The atomic number then is one less and does not reflect the number of protons in the nucleus.
