Consider the nucleus sequence derived from considering weak field interactions,
(\(g^{+}\), \(T^{+}\), \(p^{+}\), \(g^{+}\), \(T^{+}\), \(p^+\))
when a \(p^{+}\) particle captures an electron \(e{^{-}}\), the weak field from the spinning \(p^{+}\) particle holds on to \(g^{+}\) of the next higher layer still.
(\(T^+\), [\(p^{+}\), \(e^{-}\)], \(g^{+}\), \(T^{+}\), \(p^+\))
as \(g^{+}\) is moved to a further orbit, energy is absorbed. This energy absorbed may be previously been accounted as an electron neutrino.
If \(e^{-}\) in spin around \(p^{+}\) is able to establish a \(B\) weak field that holds the \(T^{+}\) particle from higher layers then it is possible,
(\(g^{+}\), \(T^{+}\), \(p^{+}\), \(e^{-}\), \(T^{+}\), \(p^+\))\(+g^{+}\)
that the \(g^{+}\) particle from the next higher layer is ejected.
It is also possible that the capture of an electron happens via the weak \(E\) field established by a spinning \(T^{+}\) particle as the weak field is a directed field with a positive and negative end,
(\(g^{+}\), [\(T^{+}\),\(e^{-}\)], \(p^{+}\), \(g^{+}\), \(T^{+}\), \(p^+\))
some energy is absorbed as the next particle is pushed to higher orbit radius.
It is possible that, subsequent to the electron capture,
(\(g^{+}\), \(T^{+}\), \(e^{-}\), \(T^{+}\), \(p^+\))\(+p^{+}+g^{+}\),
both \(p^{+}\) and \(g^{+}\) are ejected and that \(e^{-}\) in orbit establishes a \(B\) field that holds onto \(T^{+}\). A proton and a neutron is ejected with the release of energy, as \(T^{+}\) collapses inwards.
There are more possibilities here than what was observed of electron capture in the laboratory. In these cases, the electron neutrino and electron anti-neutrino are energies involved in moving the positive particles in the nucleus from lower orbits to higher orbits (energy absorbed) and from higher orbits to lower orbits (energy release), respectively. This explanation does not require the awkwardness of a particle to carry away negative energy.
