Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Gap, Gap, Gap and Quack

From the post "Band Gap? Just A Kink",

re=me2Aof(lnT){1±14Aof(lnT)merec}

and


This is a graphical explanation for bandgap, as a result of drag of free space near terminal velocity, 2c2.

Band gap energy is given by,

Δv2BG=d(re)dt|re12d(re)dt|re22

EBG=12meΔv2BG   this energy is released, moving from  re1  to  re2.

Band gap can be calculated theoretically from the difference of the square of the gradient,

d(re)dT=d(re)dtdtdxdxdT

If we assume a conservative field where the energy changes are independent of the path taken, the time taken, and where only the starting and ending points mattered, we let,

dxdt=1    --- (*)

when we move from  re1  to  re2,  this path is also constrained by Hamilton’s principle of stationary action.   (This principle and the differential equation (*) above fully describe the path from  re1  to  re2.)  And so we have,

d(re)dT=d(re)dtdxdT

d(re)dt=d(re)dTdxdT=d(re)dTdTdx

where  dTdx  is the postulated temperature gradient around the nucleus.  Obviously  x  is in the direction of  increasing re and the unit dimension of the last expression is consistent given that it is multiplied by 1 ms-1 from  dxdt=1.

Both  d(re)dT  and  dTdx  are negative which makes  d(re)dt  positve.  If  T  is not defined as energy (Joules) then a multiplicative constant is needed for a consistent unit dimension on both sides of the equation.

A derivation using the Lagrangian is presented in the posts "Energy Band Gap....Gap...Gap.Gap"  and "Pag.Pag...Pag....Pag Dnab Ygrene".