How do I know which is which, gravity (\(t_g\)) is prevalent around us, whereas electric field (\(t_c\)) is much weaker, in transient. \(\psi\) in \(t_g\) will be comparatively low in a higher ambiance of gravity around us, this I associate with the weaker \(S\) pole.
No harm dreaming out loud.
Furthermore, if Curie temperature is analogous to threshold frequency then we have,
\(h_TT_{cu}=\psi_T\)
where \(h_T\) is a normalized Planck's constant, \(T_{cu}\) is Curie temperature and \(\psi_T\) is energy density.
Energy density is not the same as energy. Energy density is more appropriate here as we are dealing with infinitely small point particles.
If we allow a \(B\) field to replace the stopping voltage,
\(h_TT=\psi_T+\Phi_T\)
where \(T\ge T_{cu}\) and the work function \(\Phi_T\ge0\).
Just like photoelectric effect.
In this case, the temperature particle of \(\psi_T\) resides in the vicinity of the atom where,
\(\psi_{atom}=\psi_T\)
where \(\psi_{atom}\) is the energy density around the atom, ie the energy densities of the two entities matches up.
Where the loci of \(\psi_{atom}=constant\) is circular, then the temperature particle is in circular orbit around the atom, along a particular locus of \(\psi_{atom}\).
If this is insanity, mine comes in a set menu. A buffet of madness.
