Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Yesterday Once More Once More

It is possible to start with the assumption that time speed is a terminal velocity in free space related to space density by v2t=FDds(x) where F,D are constants and ds(x) is a decreasing exponential with a value of dn the normal density of free space at x.

F-De^(-x/S) Inverse Proportion Profile
v2t=FDds(x)

Dividing throughout by c2,

γ(x)2=v2tc2=Fc2Dc2ds(x)

Since x, ds(x)dn and γ(x)1

1=Fc2Dc2dn

In a black hole, space density is dB and vt = 0, so γ(x) = 0

0=Fc2Dc2dB

Solving for Fc2 and Dc2

1=Dc2dBDc2dn

Dc2=1dBdn

Fc2=dBdBdn

γ(x)2=dBdBdnds(x)dBdn

γ(x)2=1+dndBdnds(x)dBdn

As before,

γ(x)2=1ds(x)dndBdn

and so,

γ(x)2=1ds(x)dndedndedndBdn

where dedndBdn is a constant.

Which bring clearly the assumption into light.  Unfortunately, it is in a black hole.  There is no reason why time speed should be a terminal velocity in free space.  If time is somehow related to photon and that photon is at terminal speed in free space, it will be consistent with the fact that photon is in a helical path through space and not a sinusoidal path confined in a one dimensional plane.  The latter requires an awkward force changing the direction of the photon, whereas the helical path suggest losses along the way in the medium of some density, that eventually the photon stops.  Not unless of course photons are magnetic monopoles, propelled by inherited magnetic and electrical properties of free space.

Time however, has never been proven to be related to light speed at all.  The fact that photons do not catch up with you does not mean time stopped.  If you are travelling away from a clock face at light speed, the clock face does not update, does not mean time stopped.