From the post "Equating To A Indefinite Integral" dated 10 Jun 2016,
qaψ=i4π˙xaψmc2
If we compare the force due to ψ and Newton's Gravitational force,
m=Me
14πa2ψ.i4π˙xaψMec2=GMea2ψ --- (*)
we have,
G=i˙xaψc2
The Gravitational constant, G depended on the size of the planet.
if i˙x=c,
G=c3aψ
For earth, aψ=6371000,
G=29979245836371000
G=4.229164e18
If we consider entanglement by dividing by the Durian Constant,
GAD=4.229164e189.029022e26=4.683967e(−9)
In the calculation for εo we did not divide the result by the Durian Constant because the particle involved is not interacting as wave and is entangled to other particles. In the case of gravity above where like particles attract, they are interacting as waves and are entangled to each other.
In the calculation for εo we did not divide the result by the Durian Constant because the particle involved is not interacting as wave and is entangled to other particles. In the case of gravity above where like particles attract, they are interacting as waves and are entangled to each other.
When we correct for the fact that the quoted G is actually πG because of the spin of the planets,
πG=π∗4.683967e(−9)=1.4715116317e−8
What happened? Maybe it should have been,
m.2c2ln(cosh(π))=Gma2ψ --- (*)
at x=aψ.
G=2a2ψc2ln(cosh(π))
G is dependent on a2ψ and I am in deeper....
G is dependent on a2ψ and I am in deeper....
G=2∗63710002∗2997924582∗ln(cosh(π))
G=1.787754e31
If we replace c2 with ˙x2 and interpret it to be the spin of the planet,
G=1.787754e31
If we replace c2 with ˙x2 and interpret it to be the spin of the planet,
˙x=2πaψ24∗60∗60
G=2a4ψ(2π24∗60∗60)2ln(cosh(π))
G=a4ψ∗2.5916926e(−8)
G is dependent on a4ψ, for earth aψ=6371000,
G=4.269863e19
We are wrong; on both counts, expression (*) and i˙x=vs.
And lastly, if we have,
And lastly, if we have,
qaψ=2˙xFρ|x=4πGM
as
4πx2.GMx2=4πGM
where the attractive force on the gravity particle interacting as wave is due only to the flux emanating below it.
G=˙xFρ|x2πM
where,
Fρ=i√2Mc2Go.tanh(Go√2Mc2(x−xz))
and so,
G=˙x2πMi√2Mc2Go.tanh(Go√2Mc2(x))
with xz=0
G=i˙xcπ√2MGo.tanh(Go√2Mc2(x))
Go√2Mc2aψ=π
G=i˙xaψc2.tanh(Go√2Mc2(x))
and G becomes a running target...
Because at x=aψ,
tanh(Go√2Mc2(aψ))=1
we can approximate,
tanh(Go√2Mc2(x))≈xaψ
G≈i˙xaψc2.xaψ
F=GMx2=i˙xa2ψc2.Mx
when i˙x=c,
F=c3a2ψ.Mx
F=GMx2=i˙xa2ψc2.Mx
when i˙x=c,
F=c3a2ψ.Mx
Gl=c3a2ψ
Gl=299792458363710002=6.638148e11
GlAD=6.638148e119.029022e26=7.352e(−16)
And deep blue is brown...
Note: What if i˙x is interpreted as the spin of the planet? Instead of i˙x=c, we have i˙x=vs and we replace c with t˙x. So,
F=c3a2ψ.Mx
F=v3sa2ψ.Mx
Gl=v3sa2ψ
Gl=465363710002
Gl=2.4771006228e(−6)
ψ at light speed wrap around a sphere manifest as gravitational mass that spins independently of ψ. ix≠vs the speed of the wave is not the spin of the mass.