F=ei3π/4D√2mc2.tanh(D√2mc2(x−xo).eiπ/4)
If G=D.eiπ/4 is real then
F=eiπ/2√2mc2G.tanh(G√2mc2(x−xz))
F=i√2mc2G.tanh(G√2mc2(x−xz))
If however we allow the augment to the function tanh(x) to be complex, and interpret eiπ/4 as rotation about the origin anti-clockwise by π/4 from eiπ/4 , and then a further rotation by 3π/4 from ei3π/4, F is rotated by π about the origin in total.
F=−√2mc2G.tanh(G√2mc2(x−xz))
F is then along the negative x direction, towards the center of the particle which is consistent with the expression
4π˙x3aψm=−q
that a negative charge is normally associated with particle.
But, this interpretation of eiπ/4 in the augment of tanh(x) is odd because tanh(x) does not accept complex augments. In this way, the modulus of a complex augment serves as the real input to the function and the argument of the complex augment rotates the x axis of the graph of the function about the origin anti-clockwise.
If this is true,
F=−√2mc2G.tanh(G√2mc2(x−xz))
without i. Force density F, points towards the center of the particle, along the negative x direction.
And we have a new class of real functions with complex augments.
Good night.
Note: This suggests eia has immunity, that
F=ei3π/4D√2mc2.tanh(D√2mc2(x−xo).eiπ/4)
F=ei3π/4.eiπ/4D√2mc2.tanh(D√2mc2(x−xo))
F=eiπD√2mc2.tanh(D√2mc2(x−xo))
F=eiπD√2mc2.tanh(D√2mc2(x−xo))
F=−D√2mc2.tanh(D√2mc2(x−xo))
eia passes through a function as a constant coefficient passes through an integral.
Warning, over generalization!!