Processing math: 37%

Monday, June 6, 2016

Field Equation Exponential Form

From the post "May The Hunt Begin" dated 01 Jun 2016,

We know that Δq decreases to zero at r=aψ, as such,

Δq=m.4πr2.Δr

q=m.4πa2ψ=dqdr|r=aψ

previously q has retained the minus sign.  If we solve for

dqdr=q

we have,

1qdq=1dr

ln(q)+C=r+B

ln(Aq)=(rD)

Aq=e(rD)

q=E.e(rD)

where at r=aψ,  dqdr|r=aψ=qaψ

we let D=aψ,  E=qaψ

q=qaψ.e(raψ)



\cfrac { dq }{ d\, r } =q_{ a_{ \psi  } }.e^{ -(r-a_{ \psi  }) }=-q

And,

\cfrac { q }{ \varepsilon _{ o } } =\cfrac { q_{ a_{ \psi  } } }{ \varepsilon _{ o } } e^{(r-a_{ \psi  }) }

This is the change in flux \cfrac { q }{ \varepsilon _{ o } } along a radial line r, which is also the Newtonian force along the line joining two particles center to center.

It is the change in q, not q itself but \Delta q decreasing at r=a_{\psi} that invites a minus sign in the exponent of the expression for force in exponential form.

The direction of the force in expression (*) depends on the sign of q_{a_{\psi}} or q.

This expression will satisfy the wave equation, whereas the expression,

F_{\small{G}}\cfrac{1}{4\pi a^2_{\psi}}=\cfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_o a^2_{\psi}}=2{ mc^{ 2 } }.ln(cosh(\pi))

does not; as shown previously.

Expression (*) should be interpreted as the decreasing effects of q over r beyond r=a_{\psi} and not the spread of q beyond a_{\psi}.  The particle extends up to r=a_{\psi} and ends abruptly, the gradient of which is given by,

 \cfrac { dq }{ d\,r }=-q

And the force is exponential.  May the force extends beyond you exponentially.