From the post "May The Hunt Begin" dated 01 Jun 2016,
We know that Δq decreases to zero at r=aψ, as such,
−Δq=m.4πr2.Δr
q=m.4πa2ψ=−dqdr|r=aψ
previously q has retained the minus sign. If we solve for
dqdr=−q
we have,
∫1qdq=∫−1dr
ln(q)+C=−r+B
ln(Aq)=−(r−D)
Aq=e−(r−D)
q=E.e−(r−D)
where at r=aψ, dqdr|r=aψ=−qaψ
we let D=aψ, E=qaψ
q=qaψ.e−(r−aψ)
∵
\cfrac { dq }{ d\, r } =q_{ a_{ \psi } }.e^{ -(r-a_{ \psi }) }=-q
And,
\cfrac { q }{ \varepsilon _{ o } } =\cfrac { q_{ a_{ \psi } } }{ \varepsilon _{ o } } e^{(r-a_{ \psi }) }
This is the change in flux \cfrac { q }{ \varepsilon _{ o } } along a radial line r, which is also the Newtonian force along the line joining two particles center to center.
It is the change in q, not q itself but \Delta q decreasing at r=a_{\psi} that invites a minus sign in the exponent of the expression for force in exponential form.
The direction of the force in expression (*) depends on the sign of q_{a_{\psi}} or q.
This expression will satisfy the wave equation, whereas the expression,
F_{\small{G}}\cfrac{1}{4\pi a^2_{\psi}}=\cfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_o a^2_{\psi}}=2{ mc^{ 2 } }.ln(cosh(\pi))
does not; as shown previously.
Expression (*) should be interpreted as the decreasing effects of q over r beyond r=a_{\psi} and not the spread of q beyond a_{\psi}. The particle extends up to r=a_{\psi} and ends abruptly, the gradient of which is given by,
\cfrac { dq }{ d\,r }=-q
And the force is exponential. May the force extends beyond you exponentially.