From previously,
B=dRv.12πεorE.
since x′=i.2πr, x′ is tangential to r everywhere
B=−idRv.1εox′E
where i was mulitplied to both the denominator and numerator.
Comparing this expression with,
B=−i∂E∂x′
which leads to the wave equation
∂2E∂t2=∂2E∂x2v2,
with a typical solution of the form,
E(x,t)=Ax.ei(ωt±kx)
We find that, since E can be replaced with D.E where D is a constant, and still satisfy the wave equation,
−i∂E∂x′=−iEx′
and
D=dRvεo
where −i rotates x′ to the x direction,
∂E∂x=Ex
∫1E∂E=∫1x∂x
If we consider only the spatial component of E,
E=Cx over the length of the wire. Since V=d.E,
C=Vd2
ie.,
E=Vd2.x where d is the length of the wire.
D.E=VdRvεo.x=Jεo.xd
Since, V=d.D.E
V=Jεo.x
where V is the voltage along the length of the wire.
This is a very interesting result. It is tempting to suggest that this E field/V voltage profile up the wire antenna is most efficient for radiation at the end of the wire. Although it is true that this expression for E is derived from B=−idEdx′, that leads to the wave equation directly. This seem like impedance matching, but
V=IR=Iεov.d
R=dεov where v is the charge average velocity along the wire that changes with the driving voltage at the end of the wire.
Have a nice day.