Through The Hole!

Happy New Year, 2019!

Through time,

van der Waals radius          f_osc                 hf_osc
2 He helium 140 pm     6.351x10¹³Hz       0.263 eV

empirical radius                 f_osc                 hf_osc
2 He helium 120 pm     6.860x10¹³Hz       0.284 eV

A beam of $hf_{osc}$ upon a $He$ atom triggers resonance at $f_{osc}$.   The atom hollows out.  Upon collapse, everything inside the hollow is send forward in time.

How to trigger a collapse?  A push at $f_{res}$, from the post "A Shield" and "A $\Psi$ Gun" dated 31 May 2016.

More material to feed Sci-fi scripts...

Hollow Metal

From the post "Shaking In The Infra Red" dated 24 Dec 2018, we have for the case of iron, $Fe$,
metallic bond size of,

$a_{\psi}=126\,pm$

from which

$f_{osc}=c\sqrt{\cfrac{2\pi}{(126*10^{-12})}}=6.6946e13\,Hz$

If we were to deliver energy by the impact of electrons,

$I_{osc}=q_e*f_{osc}=1.602176565\text{e-19}*6.6946e13=1.07259\text{e-5}\,A\approx10.7\,\mu A$

What will happen?  What is the nature of $f_{osc}$ resonance?

And for aluminium $Al$,

$f_{osc}=c\sqrt{\cfrac{2\pi}{(143*10^{-12})}}=6.2841e13\,Hz$

$I_{osc}=q_e*f_{osc}=1.602176565\text{e-19}*6.2841e13=1.007\text{e-5}\,A\approx10.1\,\mu A$

Does the metal turn transparent when $I_{osc}$ passes through it?  It is difficult to image the metal turning red hot at such low current level.  With a hole in the middle of each constituent atom, the metal may just be hollow.

Good night...

No Prize Getting Close

From the posts "X Ray, Inner Electron Cloud And Just As Shocking" dated 28 May 2016 and "X Ray, Inner Electron Cloud And Just As Shocking TWO" dated 15 Oct 2017, it was mistaken that for copper,

$N=9$

That is not true.  The inner shell of the copper atom has $N=10$ electrons surrounding a $Ar$ nucleus.  With $E_{\beta}=1.39222\dot{A}$

$a_{\psi}=\cfrac{E_{\beta}}{N.2\pi}=\cfrac{1.39222\dot{A}}{10*2\pi}=0.02215\dot{A}$

and,

$f_{res}=0.061\cfrac{299792458}{0.02215*10^{-10}}=8.2532*10^{18}$

And

$I_{res}=q_e*f_{res}=1.602176565∗10^{-19}∗8.2532*10^{18}=1.322\,A$

Compared to $1.197\,A$, close enough, but no prize.

If $N$ could be obtained by SPECULATING about the occupancy of the inner shell of copper,  $ave.E_{\alpha}$ will not be necessary to estimate $N$.  Only $E_{\beta}$ is involved in the derivation of $I_{res}$.

Can we be sure that $N=10$ for copper?  No...

Talking Entanglement

This is wrong,

$hf_{osc}$ does not return to the space dimension with the collapse of resonance.  When $\psi$ accelerate to light speed near the center of the particle, it is transported to the time dimension.  Collision in the time dimension triggers an entanglement event.  Such collisions in the time dimension is the cause of entanglement.  This damps the oscillations in the particle as energy is lost.  After the collision in time, $hf_{osc}$ returns to the space dimension,

displaced from its location where it first disappeared (the center of of the oscillating particle).

If all these speculation is true, this is how entanglement can be trigger periodically using $hf_{osc}$.  A bombardment of $hf_{osc}$ replenishes energy loss as impacted $hf_{osc}$ returning from the time dimension is displaced outside of the oscillating particle.  If $hf_{osc}$ triggers an entanglement event in the time dimension immediately, ie collides with some other particle in the time dimension upon arrival, then entanglement is also periodic.

Loss through displaced $hf_{osc}$ can be reduced by using a big oscillating particle.

But with whom does $hf_{osc}$ collide?  Another big oscillating particle created at the same time.

So we need, two simultaneous big particles and lots of $hf_{osc}$.  We may also differentiate $hf_{osc\,c}$, impacting particles that attained light speed inside the big particle and $hf_{osc\,t}$, particles that returned from the time dimension after triggering an entanglement event.

The frequency at which $\psi$ is replenished is $f_r$.  When,

$f_r\gt f_{osc}$

the big oscillating particle increase in $\psi$ and $f_{osc}$ decreases via,

$f_{osc}=c\sqrt{\cfrac{2\pi}{a_{\psi}}}$

because $a_{\psi}$ increases.  When,

$f_r\lt f_{osc}$

oscillations may stop and start with every impact and loss of $hf_{osc}$.  When,

$f_r=f_{osc}$

and very passing of $hf_{osc}$ through the center of the oscillating particle, transports one $hf_{osc}$ ($hf_{osc}\rightarrow h_{osc\,c}$) to the time dimension (at a frequency of $2f_{osc}$), oscillation is sustain without the oscillating particle growing bigger when the return particle $hf_{osc\,t}$ is displaced outside of the oscillating particle, ie lost.

We might have $hf_{osc\,r}$ for returned particles that is retained inside the oscillating particle and $hf_{osc\,l}$ for returned particles that is lost.

The simplest communication coding will be a burst of entanglements over a clocked period to signal "$X$" and none for "$Y$".  And to add noise resilience, a coded "$XXYY$" for the binary "$1$" bit and "$XYXY$" for the binary "0" bit.

And lastly, $a_{\psi}$ the size of the particle oscillating at $f_{osc}$ as governed by,

$f_{osc}=c\sqrt{\cfrac{2\pi}{a_{\psi}}}$

It is possible to change $f_{osc}$ by changing $a_{\psi}$ through the bombardment with $hf_{osc}$ at different $f_r$; as such $FM$.

The size of $hf_{osc}$ is not fixed by $f_{osc}$.  So we have a new parameter $a_{\psi\,hf}$, the size of $hf_{osc}$, in addition to $a_{\psi}$, the size of the oscillating particle.  Adjusting $a_{\psi\,hf}$ can change the fate of the returning $hf_{osc\,t}$; loss or be retained inside the oscillating particle.

 Good day.

Note:  $\psi$ is energy density not energy.  $hf_{osc}$ indicates a certain amount of energy; as $\psi$ varies, the $\psi$ ball that contains this amount of energy is of different size.  ie $a_{\psi\,hf}$ varies.

A Lower Speed Limit, Lower Energy, Einstein

From the post "Just When You Think $c$ Is The Last Constant" dated 26 Jun 2015, when considering only one particle instead of $77$ particles making up one big particle we obtain the value for light speed before adjusting for $\mu_o$ and $\varepsilon_{old}$,

$c=1.42156133$

if we adjust this value for  $\mu_o$ and $\varepsilon_{old}$ by taking a short cut,

$c=77.5871223$ adjusts to $c_{ adj }=301763665$

so,

$c=1.42156133$ adjusts to

$c_{ adj }=\cfrac{301763665}{77.5871223}*1.42156133=5528953.06\,ms^{-1}$

This value was one of the early quoted values for light speed.

Does this mean a basic particle $a_{\psi\,c}$ has a lower light speed limit?  If $a_{\psi\,c}$ does have a lower light speed, this will explain the missing matter in the universe.  $a_{\psi\,c}$ is the dark matter; it simply has not reach us yet for its slower speed.  The missing energy is the result of holding out for $c=299792458\,ms^{-1}$ where in fact it should be $c=5528953.06\,ms^{-1}$, ie

$E=mc^2=m*(5528953.06)^2$

instead of to expect,

$E=m*(299792458)^2$

Good night and Merry Christmas...

Note: 

$c_{ adj }=c.\cfrac { 2ln(cosh(3.135009)) }{ 4\pi\times10^{-7}  }$

More Red Hot

Here is a table of Van der Waals radii also from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_radii_of_the_elements_(data_page)

atomic number	symbol	name	van der Waals pm	f_osc (10^14 Hz)	hf_osc eV
1	H	hydrogen	120	0.6860	0.284
2	He	helium	140	0.6351	0.263
3	Li	lithium	182	0.5570	0.230
4	Be	beryllium	153	0.6075	0.251
5	B	boron	192	0.5423	0.224
6	C	carbon	170	0.5763	0.238
7	N	nitrogen	155	0.6036	0.250
8	O	oxygen	152	0.6095	0.252
9	F	fluorine	147	0.6198	0.256
10	Ne	neon	154	0.6056	0.250
11	Na	sodium	227	0.4988	0.206
12	Mg	magnesium	173	0.5713	0.236
13	Al	aluminium	184	0.5540	0.229
14	Si	silicon	210	0.5186	0.214
15	P	phosphorus	180	0.5601	0.232
16	S	sulfur	180	0.5601	0.232
17	Cl	chlorine	175	0.5681	0.235
18	Ar	argon	188	0.5481	0.227
19	K	potassium	275	0.4532	0.187
20	Ca	calcium	231	0.4944	0.204
21	Sc	scandium	211	0.5173	0.214
22	Ti	titanium	no data	no data	no data
23	V	vanadium	no data	no data	no data
24	Cr	chromium	no data	no data	no data
25	Mn	manganese	no data	no data	no data
26	Fe	iron	no data	no data	no data
27	Co	cobalt	no data	no data	no data
28	Ni	nickel	163	0.5886	0.243
29	Cu	copper	140	0.6351	0.263
30	Zn	zinc	139	0.6374	0.264
31	Ga	gallium	187	0.5495	0.227
32	Ge	germanium	211	0.5173	0.214
33	As	arsenic	185	0.5525	0.228
34	Se	selenium	190	0.5452	0.225
35	Br	bromine	185	0.5525	0.228
36	Kr	krypton	202	0.5287	0.219
37	Rb	rubidium	303	0.4317	0.179
38	Sr	strontium	249	0.4762	0.197
39	Y	yttrium	no data	no data	no data
40	Zr	zirconium	no data	no data	no data
41	Nb	niobium	no data	no data	no data
42	Mo	molybdenum	no data	no data	no data
43	Tc	technetium	no data	no data	no data
44	Ru	ruthenium	no data	no data	no data
45	Rh	rhodium	no data	no data	no data
46	Pd	palladium	163	0.5886	0.243
47	Ag	silver	172	0.5730	0.237
48	Cd	cadmium	158	0.5978	0.247
49	In	indium	193	0.5409	0.224
50	Sn	tin	217	0.5101	0.211
51	Sb	antimony	206	0.5236	0.217
52	Te	tellurium	206	0.5236	0.217
53	I	iodine	198	0.5340	0.221
54	Xe	xenon	216	0.5113	0.211
55	Cs	caesium	343	0.4058	0.168
56	Ba	barium	268	0.4590	0.190
57	La	lanthanum	no data	no data	no data
58	Ce	cerium	no data	no data	no data
59	Pr	praseodymium	no data	no data	no data
60	Nd	neodymium	no data	no data	no data
61	Pm	promethium	no data	no data	no data
62	Sm	samarium	no data	no data	no data
63	Eu	europium	no data	no data	no data
64	Gd	gadolinium	no data	no data	no data
65	Tb	terbium	no data	no data	no data
66	Dy	dysprosium	no data	no data	no data
67	Ho	holmium	no data	no data	no data
68	Er	erbium	no data	no data	no data
69	Tm	thulium	no data	no data	no data
70	Yb	ytterbium	no data	no data	no data
71	Lu	lutetium	no data	no data	no data
72	Hf	hafnium	no data	no data	no data
73	Ta	tantalum	no data	no data	no data
74	W	tungsten	no data	no data	no data
75	Re	rhenium	no data	no data	no data
76	Os	osmium	no data	no data	no data
77	Ir	iridium	no data	no data	no data
78	Pt	platinum	175	0.5681	0.235
79	Au	gold	166	0.5833	0.241
80	Hg	mercury	155	0.6036	0.250
81	Tl	thallium	196	0.5368	0.222
82	Pb	lead	202	0.5287	0.219
83	Bi	bismuth	207	0.5223	0.216
84	Po	polonium	197	0.5354	0.221
85	At	astatine	202	0.5287	0.219
86	Rn	radon	220	0.5066	0.210
87	Fr	francium	348	0.4028	0.167
88	Ra	radium	283	0.4467	0.185
89	Ac	actinium	no data	no data	no data
90	Th	thorium	no data	no data	no data
91	Pa	protactinium	no data	no data	no data
92	U	uranium	186	0.5510	0.228
93	Np	neptunium	no data	no data	no data
94	Pu	plutonium	no data	no data	no data
95	Am	americium	no data	no data	no data
96	Cm	curium	no data	no data	no data
97	Bk	berkelium	no data	no data	no data
98	Cf	californium	no data	no data	no data
99	Es	einsteinium	no data	no data	no data
100	Fm	fermium	no data	no data	no data
101	Md	mendelevium	no data	no data	no data
102	No	nobelium	no data	no data	no data
103	Lr	lawrencium	no data	no data	no data
104	Rf	rutherfordium	no data	no data	no data
105	Db	dubnium	no data	no data	no data
106	Sg	seaborgium	no data	no data	no data
107	Bh	bohrium	no data	no data	no data
108	Hs	hassium	no data	no data	no data
109	Mt	meitnerium	no data	no data	no data
110	Ds	darmstadtium	no data	no data	no data
111	Rg	roentgenium	no data	no data	no data
112	Cn	copernicium	no data	no data	no data
113	Nh	nihonium	no data	no data	no data
114	Fl	flerovium	no data	no data	no data
115	Mc	moscovium	no data	no data	no data
116	Lv	livermorium	no data	no data	no data
117	Ts	tennessine	no data	no data	no data
118	Og	oganesson	no data	no data	no data

For metals with obtainable data to be compared, measured threshold frequencies for photoelectric effect are about twenty $(\approx 20)$ times higher than the data here.  This corresponds to an $a_{\psi}$ about four hundred $(\approx 20^2)$ times smaller than the radii data presented here; where,

$f_{osc}=c\sqrt{\cfrac{2\pi}{a_{\psi}}}$

Good night

Hey where's my Maxwell's demon, bi-metallic strip and the demon frequency?  More missing posts!

Here, Ball Ball

Can this be so?  It is still just one $\psi$ particle,

where the little insert graph denoted oscillation through the center of the $psi$ particle/cloud.  A larger graph can be found in the post "$T^4$ Strikes Again" dated 18 Jul 2015 where the first expression for $f_{osc}$ is derived.  The expression used in the previous two posts to tabulate the elemental data is from "Another Resonance Hollow" dated 16 Dec 2018.

$f_{osc}$ plays the role as resonance frequency of the big particle and the frequency of $\psi$ around the smaller impact particle, $hf_{osc}$; both big and small particles are $\psi$ balls.

If this is so, setting a $\psi$ particle to oscillating at $f_o$ can be achieved by colliding it with another of energy $hf_o$.

$f_{osc}$ depends on $a_{\psi}$ directly and the Kelvin temperature is not involved until we consider the change in $a_{\psi}$ due to temperature.  At higher temperature, $a_{\psi}$ might reduce due to collisions.  Here, temperature is as defined in the Kinetic Theory of Gases.  This temperature is not explicitly involved in the derivation of $\psi$.

Even if this is so, how can Fermi levels be measured as a voltage difference using a voltmeter.  Why would $hf_{osc}$ captured by a particle, set into resonance (lasting for ever), as such an energy depletion, shows up as a voltage difference?

Does energy drain = voltage drop?  Still, $f$ as both $f_{osc}$ and $hf_{osc}$ is important when two particles collide.

Note:  The logic leading to this post was, find $f_{osc}$, find $hf_{osc}$, looks like Fermi levels...
This view resolve the need to state zero absolute temperature, that differentiate between Fermi energy and Fermi levels and rising energy states with rising temperature.  But, given a particle none is in orbit other than $\psi$.

Shaking In The Infra Red Crystals

Cont'd from the previous post "Shaking In The Infra Red" dated 24 Dec 2018.

We have covalent radii of the elements of the periodic table, commonly found in crystals.

atomic no.	symbol	name	Covalent  (single bond) pm	f_osc (10^14)Hz	_hf eV	Covalent (triple bond) pm	f_osc (10^14)Hz	_hf eV
1	H	hydrogen	38	1.2190	0.504	no data	no data	no data
2	He	helium	32	1.3284	0.549	no data	no data	no data
3	Li	lithium	134	0.6492	0.268	no data	no data	no data
4	Be	beryllium	90	0.7921	0.328	85	0.8151	0.337
5	B	boron	82	0.8299	0.343	73	0.8795	0.364
6	C	carbon	77	0.8564	0.354	60	0.9701	0.401
7	N	nitrogen	75	0.8677	0.359	54	1.0226	0.423
8	O	oxygen	73	0.8795	0.364	53	1.0322	0.427
9	F	fluorine	71	0.8918	0.369	53	1.0322	0.427
10	Ne	neon	69	0.9047	0.374	no data	no data	no data
11	Na	sodium	154	0.6056	0.250	no data	no data	no data
12	Mg	magnesium	130	0.6591	0.273	127	0.6668	0.276
13	Al	aluminium	118	0.6918	0.286	111	0.7133	0.295
14	Si	silicon	111	0.7133	0.295	102	0.7441	0.308
15	P	phosphorus	106	0.7299	0.302	94	0.7751	0.321
16	S	sulfur	102	0.7441	0.308	95	0.7710	0.319
17	Cl	chlorine	99	0.7553	0.312	93	0.7792	0.322
18	Ar	argon	97	0.7630	0.316	96	0.7670	0.317
19	K	potassium	196	0.5368	0.222	no data	no data	no data
20	Ca	calcium	174	0.5697	0.236	133	0.6516	0.269
21	Sc	scandium	144	0.6262	0.259	114	0.7038	0.291
22	Ti	titanium	136	0.6444	0.266	108	0.7231	0.299
23	V	vanadium	125	0.6721	0.278	106	0.7299	0.302
24	Cr	chromium	127	0.6668	0.276	103	0.7404	0.306
25	Mn	manganese	139	0.6374	0.264	103	0.7404	0.306
26	Fe	iron	125	0.6721	0.278	102	0.7441	0.308
27	Co	cobalt	126	0.6695	0.277	96	0.7670	0.317
28	Ni	nickel	121	0.6832	0.283	101	0.7477	0.309
29	Cu	copper	138	0.6397	0.265	120	0.6860	0.284
30	Zn	zinc	131	0.6566	0.272	no data	no data	no data
31	Ga	gallium	126	0.6695	0.277	121	0.6832	0.283
32	Ge	germanium	122	0.6803	0.281	114	0.7038	0.291
33	As	arsenic	119	0.6889	0.285	106	0.7299	0.302
34	Se	selenium	116	0.6977	0.289	107	0.7265	0.300
35	Br	bromine	114	0.7038	0.291	110	0.7165	0.296
36	Kr	krypton	110	0.7165	0.296	108	0.7231	0.299
37	Rb	rubidium	211	0.5173	0.214	no data	no data	no data
38	Sr	strontium	192	0.5423	0.224	139	0.6374	0.264
39	Y	yttrium	162	0.5904	0.244	124	0.6748	0.279
40	Zr	zirconium	148	0.6177	0.255	121	0.6832	0.283
41	Nb	niobium	137	0.6420	0.266	116	0.6977	0.289
42	Mo	molybdenum	145	0.6241	0.258	113	0.7069	0.292
43	Tc	technetium	156	0.6017	0.249	110	0.7165	0.296
44	Ru	ruthenium	126	0.6695	0.277	103	0.7404	0.306
45	Rh	rhodium	135	0.6468	0.267	106	0.7299	0.302
46	Pd	palladium	131	0.6566	0.272	112	0.7101	0.294
47	Ag	silver	153	0.6075	0.251	137	0.6420	0.266
48	Cd	cadmium	148	0.6177	0.255	no data	no data	no data
49	In	indium	144	0.6262	0.259	146	0.6219	0.257
50	Sn	tin	141	0.6329	0.262	132	0.6541	0.271
51	Sb	antimony	138	0.6397	0.265	127	0.6668	0.276
52	Te	tellurium	135	0.6468	0.267	121	0.6832	0.283
53	I	iodine	133	0.6516	0.269	125	0.6721	0.278
54	Xe	xenon	130	0.6591	0.273	122	0.6803	0.281
55	Cs	caesium	225	0.5010	0.207	no data	no data	no data
56	Ba	barium	198	0.5340	0.221	149	0.6156	0.255
57	La	lanthanum	169	0.5781	0.239	139	0.6374	0.264
58	Ce	cerium	no data	no data	no data	131	0.6566	0.272
59	Pr	praseodymium	no data	no data	no data	128	0.6642	0.275
60	Nd	neodymium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
61	Pm	promethium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
62	Sm	samarium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
63	Eu	europium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
64	Gd	gadolinium	no data	no data	no data	132	0.6541	0.271
65	Tb	terbium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
66	Dy	dysprosium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
67	Ho	holmium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
68	Er	erbium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
69	Tm	thulium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
70	Yb	ytterbium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
71	Lu	lutetium	160	0.5941	0.246	131	0.6566	0.272
72	Hf	hafnium	150	0.6136	0.254	122	0.6803	0.281
73	Ta	tantalum	138	0.6397	0.265	119	0.6889	0.285
74	W	tungsten	146	0.6219	0.257	115	0.7007	0.290
75	Re	rhenium	159	0.5960	0.246	110	0.7165	0.296
76	Os	osmium	128	0.6642	0.275	109	0.7198	0.298
77	Ir	iridium	137	0.6420	0.266	107	0.7265	0.300
78	Pt	platinum	128	0.6642	0.275	110	0.7165	0.296
79	Au	gold	144	0.6262	0.259	123	0.6776	0.280
80	Hg	mercury	149	0.6156	0.255	no data	no data	no data
81	Tl	thallium	148	0.6177	0.255	150	0.6136	0.254
82	Pb	lead	147	0.6198	0.256	137	0.6420	0.266
83	Bi	bismuth	146	0.6219	0.257	135	0.6468	0.267
84	Po	polonium	no data	no data	no data	129	0.6616	0.274
85	At	astatine	no data	no data	no data	138	0.6397	0.265
86	Rn	radon	145	0.6241	0.258	133	0.6516	0.269
87	Fr	francium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
88	Ra	radium	no data	no data	no data	159	0.5960	0.246
89	Ac	actinium	no data	no data	no data	140	0.6351	0.263
90	Th	thorium	no data	no data	no data	136	0.6444	0.266
91	Pa	protactinium	no data	no data	no data	129	0.6616	0.274
92	U	uranium	no data	no data	no data	118	0.6918	0.286
93	Np	neptunium	no data	no data	no data	116	0.6977	0.289
94	Pu	plutonium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
95	Am	americium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
96	Cm	curium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
97	Bk	berkelium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
98	Cf	californium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
99	Es	einsteinium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
100	Fm	fermium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
101	Md	mendelevium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
102	No	nobelium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
103	Lr	lawrencium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
104	Rf	rutherfordium	no data	no data	no data	131	0.6566	0.272
105	Db	dubnium	no data	no data	no data	126	0.6695	0.277
106	Sg	seaborgium	no data	no data	no data	121	0.6832	0.283
107	Bh	bohrium	no data	no data	no data	119	0.6889	0.285
108	Hs	hassium	no data	no data	no data	118	0.6918	0.286
109	Mt	meitnerium	no data	no data	no data	113	0.7069	0.292
110	Ds	darmstadtium	no data	no data	no data	112	0.7101	0.294
111	Rg	roentgenium	no data	no data	no data	118	0.6918	0.286
112	Cn	copernicium	no data	no data	no data	130	0.6591	0.273
113	Nh	nihonium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
114	Fl	flerovium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
115	Mc	moscovium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
116	Lv	livermorium	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
117	Ts	tennessine	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data
118	Og	oganesson	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data	no data

What about Fermi levels?

Note:  The data are derived from  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_radii_of_the_elements_(data_page)