From the post ""the post "Not Exponential, But Hyperbolic And Positive Gravity!" dated 22 Nov 2014,
Fρ=ei3π/4D√2mc2.tanh(D√2mc2(x−xo).eiπ/4)
where we insist that,
G=D.eiπ/4
is real,
But given,
tanh(x)=ex−e−xex+e−x=1−e−2x1+e−2x
D can be real.
Consider,
eiπ/4=(eiπ/2)1/2=√i
that follows from Euler's
eiπ+1=0
An so,
tanh(h√i)=1−e−2h√i1+e−2h√i
where
h=D√2mc2(x−xo)
and
ei3π/4=i3/2=i√i
Fρ=i√i.D√2mc2.1−e−2h√i1+e−2h√i
and if we define,
φ=√i
Fρ=φ3.D√2mc2.1−e−2φh1+e−2φh
where
φ rotates 45o and φ3 rotates 135o from the direction of x.
Cosmetics to bring attention to the these two rotations; they have significance, but what?
Furthermore,
√2mc2=√m(√2c)2
also has significance; it implies that across two orthogonal dimensions, in place of c is √2c. This suggests that if entanglement is the reason for light speed limit, then entanglement is dimension specific, a different type of entanglement occurs along each orthogonal dimension; a different entanglement of the specific energy defining that dimension. Particles can be limited separately along tc where in entanglement with other particles share electrostatic energy, and at the same time limited along tg where they share gravitational energy; ditto for tT.
Since we normally dealt with energy of a particular sort, √2c has never arise until we cross between orthogonal dimensions.
In space,
c2+c2=2c2
2c2+c2=3c2
And the speed limit we encountered first was,
c=√3k
where k is a constant, c light speed. Three groups of particles entangled separately across three space dimensions with the one particle under observation.
Note: √3=1.7320508075688773... is not rational. Looking for more significant numbers to c may just be chasing after the tail of √3.