F=25mψa2ψ(c2πaψ)21aψ
instead,
Fρ=25mψa2ψ(c2πaψ)21aψ
since we are dealing with ψ and it is force density all along, mψ=m is mass density, a constant. So,
Fρn1=25mψa2ψn1(c2πaψn1)21aψn1
then
and similarly,
Fρn2=110π2mψc2aψn2
In general,
Fρn=110π2mψc2aψc.13√n
since,
1n=(aψcaψn)3
as such,
In general,
Fρn=110π2mψc2aψc.13√n
since,
1n=(aψcaψn)3
as such,
W1→2=∫aψn2aψn1Fρndaψ
W1→2=∫n2n1Fρnd(3√n.aψc)
W1→2=mψc210π2∫n2n113√n.d3√n
and
W1→2=mψc210π2[ln(3√n2)−ln(3√n1)]=mψc210π2ln(3√n23√n1)
W1→2=mψc210π2ln(aψn2aψn1)
Which is somehow very satisfying, irrespective of all and any maths and logic blunders. It is so nice I took a second look. Since,
fc=c2πaψc
the expression suggests,
h=c5πaψcmψ
which would be a constant for a given particle. Nice!
A plot of ln((n_2/n_1)^(1/3)) for n_1 = 1 to 7 is given below,
As aψn1→aψn2, there is an release of energy as the particle grows bigger. W1→2 requires energy and reduces the amount of energy released.
The most energy required from a transition from n1=1 results in a absorption line.
Big particle with less energy in ψ is counter-intuitive. Big particle has ψ going around its circumference at lower frequency, given that ψ has a constant speed, light speed.
But a big particle contains a small particle!?
A big particle has more extensive ψ but its ψ has less energy when we take reference at the circumference/surface of the particle.
v=rω
All inner ψ have lower speed, when they do not slide along each other. ψ outside from the center of the particle need to move faster; the fastest of which is light speed.