It would seem that it is possible to send a basic particle to light speed in space and so convert it into a corresponding photon. There is no ambiguity when the photon is converted back to a basic particle at the end of the trip. There is enough information in all basic particles to make such conversions back and forth consistently.
In this case, the space dimension around \(t_T\) is uncoiled and set off at light speed; the particle now is a photon. The reversion uncoils the time dimension around \(x\) and the photon is again a basic particle. Since K.E along the time dimension is twice that along the space dimension at the same speed \(c\), energy is removed from the particle on conversion to a photon.
\(E_{to\,\,ph}=-\cfrac{1}{2}mc^2\)
And positive energy input is required to convert the photon back into the corresponding basic particle.
How then to uncoil a space dimension warp around time, and vice versa? Massive collisions will work as there are no ambiguities. But with what particles/photons?
When energy of this particle oscillates from \(t_T\) to \(x_2\) at a high rate, \(\cfrac{d\,E}{d\,t_g}\gt\gt 0\), it is possible then that \(x_2\) attains light speed \(c\). At the reversion, the same particle is used but the oscillation is when K.E along \(x_2\) reverts to energy along \(t_T\) also at a high rate.
This would require technology to manipulate the energy oscillations of the particles.
This photon will also work in a similar way.
It is important that as this photon passes, energy is transferred to the space dimension on forward conversion from the basic particle to the corresponding photon; and energy is oscillating from the space dimension to \(t_T\) on reversion back from the photon to a basic particle.
Both such particles that convert a basic particle to a photon and back will be oscillating slowly and will not interact with the fast oscillations of the basic particles, hopefully.
It is likely to use a particle beam on conversion to photon and on reversion, a photon beam to avoid photon contamination and particle contamination of the respective outputs.
Beam me up again , Scotty!
