\(p_{t_c}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_g\)) and \(p_{t_c}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_T\)) could be the charge-pair which existed all along but detectable separately only when high energy beam is scattered.
An orbiting electron in the vicinity of \(p_{t_T}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_c\)) or \(p_{t_g}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_c\)) will receive electric potential energy and be ejected as in photoelectric effects.
Compton shift is then a detectable shift in the oscillating frequency of \(p_{t_c}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_g\)), \(p_{t_c}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\), \(t_T\)), \(p_{t_T}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_g\)) or \(p_{t_g}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_T\)) that results from mechanical collisions of orbiting electrons and these particles. Since \(p_{t_T}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_c\)) and \(p_{t_g}\)(\(x_1\),\(x_2\),\(t_c\)) will eject the electrons and not readily collide with it, Compton scattering is mainly upon the rest of the \(\cfrac{2}{3}\) photons.
If we can detect the partial charge on the photons and can accurately count such particles, these issues can be cleared experimentally.
They are fictions as they are from my mind. Whether it is science or delusion depends on whether you have stood on a platform with a speaker mounted on it, pulsating at 7.489 Hz in "zero gravity". You have to remember to switch off the speaker when you return, otherwise you wouldn't land readily.
Why are you in my dream anyway?
