Wednesday, October 18, 2017

The Path Also Taken

If we use,

\(\sqrt[3]{N}.2\pi a_{\psi\,c}=\lambda_\beta\)

and

\(\cfrac{ave.\,E\alpha}{E\beta}=\sqrt[3]{\cfrac{N+1}{N}}\)

\(\cfrac{N+1}{N}=\left(\cfrac{ave.\,E\alpha}{E\beta}\right)^3\)

\(\cfrac{N+1}{N}=(\cfrac{1.54184}{1.39222})^3=1.36\)

\(N=9\)

since,

\(\cfrac{9+1}{9}=1.37\)

So,

\(a_{\psi\,c}=\cfrac{\lambda_\beta}{\sqrt[3]{N}.2\pi }\)

\(a_{\psi\,c}=\cfrac{1.39222}{\sqrt[3]{9}.2\pi }\)

\(a_{\psi\,c}=0.10493e-10=0.010493\,\,nm\)

This is the first time we have actually obtained \(a_{\psi\,\,c}\) from experimental data.  It is however, way smaller than expected, because,

\(\sqrt[3]{N}.a_{\psi\,c}=a_{\psi\,\small{N}}\)

when \(N=77\)

\(a_{\psi\,\small{N}}=4.4639e-11\,\,m\)

which smaller than the values for \(a_{\psi}\) obtained from hydrogen spectra lines experiments, in the post "Sizing Them Up" dated 3 Dec 2014.

Nonetheless,

\(f_{res}=0.061\cfrac { c }{ a_{\psi} }\)

\(f_{res}=0.061\cfrac { 299792458 }{ \sqrt[3]{9}*0.10493e-10 }\)

\(f_{res}=0.83786*10^{18}\,\,Hz\)

which is nine times less than the previously calculated value of \(f_{res}=7.473*10^{18} Hz\).  And so the current that would cause resonance is,

\(I_{res}=\cfrac{1.1974}{9}=0.13304\,\,A\)

This current reduced by an integer divisor will also cause resonance but slower.  Currents higher by an integer multiplier than \(I_{res}\) will not caused resonance.  But it is,

\(\sqrt[3]{N}.a_{\psi\,c}=\sqrt[3]{9}*0.10493e-10=2.1826e-11\)

that is resonating.  What is this entity than is about nine times bigger than the previous value,

\(a_{\psi}=0.2447e-11\)

Does,

\(\sqrt[3]{N}.2\pi a_{\psi\,c}=\lambda_\beta\)

make sense in the first place?  Or,

\(N.2\pi a_{\psi}=\lambda_\beta\)

What is happening here?  What are we setting into resonance?  \(a_{\psi\,c}\), \(\sqrt[3]{N}a_{\psi\,c}\) or \(Na_{\psi}\)?

The lower values for \(a_{\psi\,c}\) suggests that,

\(\cfrac{a_{\psi\,1}}{a_{\psi\,1}}=\left(\cfrac{N_1}{N_2}\right)^3\)

maybe wrong;  that when particles merge, the total volume of \(\psi\) may not be conserved.

The expression, \(N.a_{\psi}\) suggests that,

the particles, \(a_{\psi}\) are stacked up. Which would imply that X-ray emission is along an axis where \(N\) particles stack up; perpendicularly outwards, across \(N\).

If \(a_{\psi}\) being stack up is true, then it would be impossible to obtain X ray from atomized \(Cu\) vapor nor non-homogeneous alloys of \(Cu\) where \(a_{\psi}\) cannot stack up.