For the factor C, we consider the potential energy in bringing a charge from infinity to its location reo in the configuration around the positive charge along the line joining it and the positive charge.
In the case of electrostatic consideration,
PE=limr→∞q2A4πεo(1reo−1r)
For the case developed in the post "Like Wave, Like Particle, Not Attracted to Electrons"
PE=mec2limr→∞{ln(rreo)+C(reo−r)}
Equating the two,
mec2limr→∞{ln(rreo)+C(reo−r)}=limr→∞q2A4πεo(1reo−1r)
limr→∞{ln(rreo)+C(reo−r)}=limr→∞q2A4πεomec2(1reo−1r)
C=limr→∞{1(reo−r)q2A4πεomec2(1reo−1r)−1(reo−r)ln(rreo)}
C=limr→∞{−q2A4πεomec21reor−1(reo−r)ln(rreo)}
C=limr→∞{−1(reo−r)ln(rreo)}=0
For the case developed in the post "Like Wave, Like Particle, Not Attracted to Electrons II"
refe−C.ref=reoe−C.reoe−q2A4πεomec21reo
When C = 0,
ref=reoe−q2A4πεomec21reo
Which means ref can be determined theoretically once the electron configuration is known (for A), because reo can also be calculated given the electron configuration. And the ionization energy that was developed in the post "Like Wave, Like Particle, Not Attracted to Electrons", can also be obtained,
Es=mec2{ln(reoref)}
since, ref<reo, Es is positive as expected.