\({E}_{p}={m}_{p}c^2\) = (6.2948e-34)*299792458^2 = 5.6575e-17 J
Momentum of a photon is
\({P}_{p}={m}_{p}c\) = (6.2948e-34)*299792458 = 1.8871e-25 kgm s-1
Mass of a photon is
\({m}_{p}\) = 6.2948e-34 kg
Charge on a photon dipole, which was derived using Planck's relation, is
\(q\) = 1.4745*10^(-43) C this may not be true.
Planck's relation is still true beyond the plateau region of the Electron E_max vs Photon Frequency graph in the post "Fodo Electric Effect"graph reproduced below,
However, \({E}_{max}\) dependence on \(f\) incident photon frequency, is probabilistic and statistical. Changing \(f\) changes the radius of the photon helix path and so changes the probability of colliding with an orbital electron. That in turns changes the mean value of the measured \({E}_{max}\).
Planck's relation is not a intrinsic property of photons. Photons have constant energy, \({m}_{p}c^2\).
We can check
\(h=4{ r }_{ e } {m}_{p}c-\cfrac { 4 }{ c }{r}_{e}.\Phi\)
derived in the post "Light Indeed Light" for the value of Planck's constant,
\(h\) = 4*235e-12*(6.2948e-34*299792458)/(1.60217657e-19)-4*235e-12*2.29/299792458
\(h\) = 1.1000e-15 eV s-1
Based on this model Planck's Constant is no longer a constant, and its calculation and the calculation for \({m}_{p}\) relies a lot on the collision model between photons and orbital electrons. The paper from which the data was taken estimates \(h\) via two methods producing values of (0.94+.48)e-15 and (2.92+0.77)e-15.
