for re1, we consider the centripetal force,
mec2re1=q.2q4πεor2e1−q.q4πεo(re1+re2)2
for re2,
mec2re2=q.2q4πεor2e2−q.q4πεo(re1+re2)2
re2re1=2r2e1−1(re1+re2)22r2e2−1(re1+re2)2
re2re1=2(re1+re2)2−r2e12(re1+re2)2−r2e2.r2e2r2e1
re1re2=2(re1+re2)2−r2e12(re1+re2)2−r2e2
Let x=re1re2
x=2(x+1)2−x22(x+1)2−1
x has three solutions. The only positive solution is,
x = 1, re1=re2
this suggest that this configuration is possible.
And for the next extreme case, without lost of generality, re1>re2, the diagram on the right
mec2re1=q.2q4πεor2e1−q.q4πεo(re1−re2)2
and
mec2re2=q.2q4πεor2e2+q.q4πεo(re1−re2)2
re2re1=2r2e1−1(re1−re2)22r2e2+1(re1−re2)2
re2re1=2(re1−re2)2−r2e12(re1−re2)2+r2e2.r2e2r2e1
re1re2=2(re1−re2)2−r2e12(re1−re2)2+r2e2
Let x=re1re2
x=2(x−1)2−x22(x−1)2+1
x also has three solution, a complex pair, and a positive solution,
x=0.3684, re1=0.3684∗re2
Since we have assumed that re1>re2, this solution is not admissible. This configuration is not possible. This might suggest that the electrons will always remain on the opposite side of the positive charge.
We will consider the limiting case of,
For re1, again we look at the centripetal force,
mec2re1=q.2q4πεor2e1−1√2.q.q4πεo(r2e1+r2e2)
mec2re2=q.2q4πεor2e2−1√2.q.q4πεo(r2e1+r2e2)
re2re1=2r2e1−1√2(r2e1+r2e2)2r2e2−1√2(r2e1+r2e2)
re2re1=2√2(r2e1+r2e2)−r2e12√2(r2e1+r2e2)−r2e2.r2e2r2e1
re1re2=2√2(r2e1+r2e2)−r2e12√2(r2e1+r2e2)−r2e2
Let x=re1re2
x=2√2(x2+12)−x22√2(x2+12)−1
x also has three solution, a complex pair, and a positive solution,
x=1, re1=re2
This is possible. In this case there is a tangential force component equal to
Ft=1√2.q.q4πεo(r2e1+r2e2)
but the speed of the electron will not increase further. Speed of the electron is at light speed c. As the electron move relative to one another, the centripetal force changes and the orbital radius changes. If we now consider a small displacement Δa towards the other electron,
We see that the electrons will experience a force that drive them further apart. And the electrons will remain on opposite sides of the positive charge.