Neutral Particles, Neutral Temperature And KaBoom

The flow into a point is the reverse of the flow out of the point by introducing a negative sign only if there is high symmetry like in the case at the center of a sphere where the radius indicates equal vectors.  When the vectors are not equal reversing the flow by introducing a negative sign generates a new flow into the point, not the negative of the flow initially.

If charge is a continuum, when does it end?  How big can a positive charge gets given the right conditions?

What happens when a neutral charge is spinning?

If the manifestation of any one field depended on the relative phase between two, as charge sweeps from negative to zero, to positive, then when the charge is zero... well everything goes zero as if nothing is in spin.

Still there would be three types of neutral particles; electric, gravity and temperature.

Neutral temperature is not at zero temperature as defined on the Kelvin scale.  Neutral particles are not at \(a_{\psi}=0\) but are big at \(a_{\psi\,ne}\).

What if there is a field as a neutral particle spins?  This field is the field at zero phase between the two fields that together manifest the observed field.  It is one field in isolation.  And each type of neutral particle (electric, gravity and temperature) presents one field.

It is possible, that each field instead has three orthogonal components, two of which cancels when two fields are orthogonal, the remaining component presents itself when the particle is in spin.  As charge changes from positive to negative, a phase shift from \(90^o\) to \(-90^o\) occurs (relatively) between the two fields and a different component remains as another set of two components cancel.  In this paradoxical way a neutral particle in spin generates the highest possible fields compared to charged particles.

A neutral particle suggests that all the wave energy is in oscillations.  This is still a wave-particle?  It no longer exert a field in space stationary but it has size \(a_{\psi\,ne}\) and provides the strongest field in spin.  It is the highest negative charge possible.

As long as spins generates a field,

the layered atom model still holds.

Maybe all spinning particles in a nucleus are neutral that, generates the strongest field in spin possible.  And isotopes are of off neutral particles in spin that have a charge, generate a weaker fields in spin and can be bigger (positive) or smaller (negative) than a nucleus of neutral particles.

This makes \(a_{\psi\,c}\) very dangerous as \(a_{\psi\,ne}+a_{\psi\,c}\) makes a neutral charge positive.  A change in charge switches the type of field generated in spin and rearranges the layers inside the nucleus and may cause the disintegration of the atom.

KaBoom!