月舫舳舻尖
独守夜海深
静泊云圃恬
《月船》
Saturday, May 20, 2017
Hot Earth Not Hot Sun
Earth is heating up due to an upturn in magnetic field; heat is released to suppress the increasing magnetic field (Lentz's Law). The Sun remains as hot.
Moisture normally holds the soil particles together. When moisture is removed by the heat from the top soil, the fine soil particles break loose and are stirred by the winds into sand storms. This is happening now.
To continue growing crops, move the soil into well drained plastic trays/containers, insulated/elevated from the ground, and plant in the trays/containers. Even tresses can be grown this way in big insulated soil containers.
Cover and insulate all fresh water resource, if not, drain all water into covered storage insulated from the ground. Store water underground, insulated, contained and prevented from evaporating.
Stop every other constructions. Save water!
Moisture normally holds the soil particles together. When moisture is removed by the heat from the top soil, the fine soil particles break loose and are stirred by the winds into sand storms. This is happening now.
To continue growing crops, move the soil into well drained plastic trays/containers, insulated/elevated from the ground, and plant in the trays/containers. Even tresses can be grown this way in big insulated soil containers.
Cover and insulate all fresh water resource, if not, drain all water into covered storage insulated from the ground. Store water underground, insulated, contained and prevented from evaporating.
Stop every other constructions. Save water!
Tuesday, May 16, 2017
Squawky Maths, Brain Dead
Yes, at \(x=x_f\) along the line that passes through the focus of the parabola,
\(\cfrac { \partial \psi }{ \partial x }|_{x_f} =0\)
\( \cfrac { \partial ^{ 2 }\psi }{ \partial x^{ 2 } } |_{x_f}=0\)
on the parabola profile. But at the focus, the effect of \(\psi\), and the rate of change of \(\psi\),
\( \cfrac { \partial \psi }{ \partial t } \neq 0\)
We are looking at the solutions of a partial differential equation not an algebraic equation. Strictly speaking,
\( \cfrac { \partial ^{ 2 }\psi }{ \partial x^{ 2 } } |_{x_f}=0\)
cannot be substituted into
\(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\cfrac{c^2p}{\sqrt{2}}.\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}.e^{-i\pi/4}\)
before solving the equation. But intuitively,
\(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=0\)
seems valid along \(x=x_f\) and \(\psi\) varies due to a change in \(t\), time only.
\(\cfrac { \partial \psi }{ \partial x }|_{x_f} =0\)
\( \cfrac { \partial ^{ 2 }\psi }{ \partial x^{ 2 } } |_{x_f}=0\)
on the parabola profile. But at the focus, the effect of \(\psi\), and the rate of change of \(\psi\),
\( \cfrac { \partial \psi }{ \partial t } \neq 0\)
We are looking at the solutions of a partial differential equation not an algebraic equation. Strictly speaking,
\( \cfrac { \partial ^{ 2 }\psi }{ \partial x^{ 2 } } |_{x_f}=0\)
cannot be substituted into
\(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\cfrac{c^2p}{\sqrt{2}}.\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}.e^{-i\pi/4}\)
before solving the equation. But intuitively,
\(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=0\)
seems valid along \(x=x_f\) and \(\psi\) varies due to a change in \(t\), time only.
Manipulating \(\psi\)
With the second focus,
The reasoning is that from Einstein's equivalence principle that the mass of an object obtained from gravity observations is the same mass when the object is subjected to a force, then it is postulated here that force-interactions are gravitational in nature and are due to gravity particles and gravitational energy density \(\psi\). This \(\psi\) can be made to distribute in a parabola profile such that the term,
\(\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}=0 \)
at a focus point, such that in the expression,
\(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\cfrac{c^2p}{\sqrt{2}}.\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}.e^{-i\pi/4}\)
from the post "My Own Wave equation", dated 20 Nov 2014, the solution for \(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}\) is without an explicit phase lag, \(e^{-i\pi/4}\).
Notice that in the case of a jet engine in the top diagram, the second focus point is beyond the fan axial.
Do they work?
The reasoning is that from Einstein's equivalence principle that the mass of an object obtained from gravity observations is the same mass when the object is subjected to a force, then it is postulated here that force-interactions are gravitational in nature and are due to gravity particles and gravitational energy density \(\psi\). This \(\psi\) can be made to distribute in a parabola profile such that the term,
\(\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}=0 \)
at a focus point, such that in the expression,
\(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\cfrac{c^2p}{\sqrt{2}}.\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}.e^{-i\pi/4}\)
from the post "My Own Wave equation", dated 20 Nov 2014, the solution for \(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}\) is without an explicit phase lag, \(e^{-i\pi/4}\).
Notice that in the case of a jet engine in the top diagram, the second focus point is beyond the fan axial.
Do they work?
Monday, May 15, 2017
Second Focus
Remeber the post "My Own Wave equation", dated 20 Nov 2014, where
\(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\cfrac{c^2p}{\sqrt{2}}.\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}.e^{-i\pi/4}\)
On several occasions where \(\psi\) rests on a parabola contour/generated surface with \(\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}=0\) at the focus, the resulting zero coefficient before \(e^{-i\pi/4}\) removes the phase lag and so removes the delay in the change of \(\psi\) in time.
A second focus is possible,
A magnetic coil deformed to provide such a focus will not have a phase lag in its response at the focus also.
This was left unsaid after ultra-bright LEDs, detection points, jet engines, under-water jets, etc.
Hello!
\(\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\cfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\cfrac{c^2p}{\sqrt{2}}.\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}.e^{-i\pi/4}\)
On several occasions where \(\psi\) rests on a parabola contour/generated surface with \(\cfrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}=0\) at the focus, the resulting zero coefficient before \(e^{-i\pi/4}\) removes the phase lag and so removes the delay in the change of \(\psi\) in time.
A second focus is possible,
A magnetic coil deformed to provide such a focus will not have a phase lag in its response at the focus also.
This was left unsaid after ultra-bright LEDs, detection points, jet engines, under-water jets, etc.
Hello!