If a blackhole is a mass of negative gravity particles so dense that the potential field around it holds back particles at light speed, then equivalently there can be two new types of blackhole one due to a collection of negative charge particles, and another due to negative temperature particles. Remember that from post "Particle Clouds" dated 13 Jul 2015, a particle can reside in the \(\psi\) of another particle of the same type; as the graphs of \(F_v\), force density around any particle, show, particles of the same type are attracted to each other in close proximity (eg. post "Less Mass But No Theoretical Mass" dated 23 Nov 2014).
In an analogous way, a group of positive particles so dense, can set up a potential field around them that even particles with light speed cannot approach. As kinetic energy is traded for potential energy, the approaching particles are reduced to zero speed before reaching the group of positive particles; forming a ring of lights around the group of particles. A sort of anti-blackholes due to positive gravity particles, positive charge particles and positive temperature particles. However, since positive particles does not attract each other at close proximity without at least one of them being heavier in mass (possibly made artificially more massive), anti-blackhole may not be as common.
In total, six particle phenomenons, three types of blackhole and three types of anit-blackhole, all with mega effects visible at the cosmic level.
Cosmic Insanity!
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Friday, October 30, 2015
It's Nu-clue-lar
If the heat released in a big explosion is due to positive temperature particles, then there is also a negative temperature particles front, which have less mass, before the high temperature heat front.
Ever witness a nuclear test? There is also a EMP (electro-magnetic pusle) due to a electron front, and a blast wave due to protons.
Spinning electrons generates magnetic fields and spinning protons generate gravitational fields. The generated gravitational fields lift objects into the air; the anti-gravitational effects in a blast wave is not due to strong winds (air current).
Then, there are the positive and negative gravitational particles. Both would be secondary wave fronts; a secondary EMP but now positive, and a secondary heat front.
In all cases, force fields due to the particles and due to their spins are manifested, so there are six paired wave fronts, electro(n)-magnetic, proton-gravity, negative temperature-gravity, positive temperature-electric, negative gravity-magnetic and positive gravity-electric.
KaBloom!
Ever witness a nuclear test? There is also a EMP (electro-magnetic pusle) due to a electron front, and a blast wave due to protons.
Spinning electrons generates magnetic fields and spinning protons generate gravitational fields. The generated gravitational fields lift objects into the air; the anti-gravitational effects in a blast wave is not due to strong winds (air current).
Then, there are the positive and negative gravitational particles. Both would be secondary wave fronts; a secondary EMP but now positive, and a secondary heat front.
In all cases, force fields due to the particles and due to their spins are manifested, so there are six paired wave fronts, electro(n)-magnetic, proton-gravity, negative temperature-gravity, positive temperature-electric, negative gravity-magnetic and positive gravity-electric.
KaBloom!
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Where Is The Flying Shopping Cart?
Which leads us back to,
The cold body provides the negative temperature particles and the hot body provides the positive temperature particles, but where is the composite of a negative particle in rotation around a positive particle(s) nucleus that creates a gravitational field?
In the hot body? In the cold body? In the supportive structure?
Answer: Mostly on the hot body.
The cold body provides the negative temperature particles and the hot body provides the positive temperature particles, but where is the composite of a negative particle in rotation around a positive particle(s) nucleus that creates a gravitational field?
In the hot body? In the cold body? In the supportive structure?
Answer: Mostly on the hot body.
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Making Waves
These people need a reminder of what I can do! Maths and more maths.
After acquiring a negative temperature particle in orbit around/in a positive temperature particle (or a group of positive temperature particles), the fluid particle develops a gravitational field along the axis of rotation. This force when directed against earth's gravity, lifts the fluid particle. When the fluid particle is also in rotation, the combined effect is the characteristic profile of a wave.
The maximum ascending gradient of the wave profile occurs at,
\(g_{max,\,asc}=g_w-g_e\)
when the fluid particle acquired gravitational force opposes earth's gravity directly.
The maximum point of the wave profile occurs when,
\(g_e-g_w=0\)
when the fluid particle acquired gravitational force cancels earth's gravity and continues to rotates into the direction of earth's gravity, downwards. When the fluid particle acquired gravitational force adds to earth's gravity, the fluid particle descends with greater acceleration than its ascendance.
\(g_{max,\,des}=g_w+g_e\)
As,
\(g_w+g_e\gt g_w-g_e\)
\(g_{max,\,des}\gt g_{max,\,asc}\)
This gives the characteristic short downward curve of the wave.
After acquiring a negative temperature particle in orbit around/in a positive temperature particle (or a group of positive temperature particles), the fluid particle develops a gravitational field along the axis of rotation. This force when directed against earth's gravity, lifts the fluid particle. When the fluid particle is also in rotation, the combined effect is the characteristic profile of a wave.
The maximum ascending gradient of the wave profile occurs at,
\(g_{max,\,asc}=g_w-g_e\)
when the fluid particle acquired gravitational force opposes earth's gravity directly.
The maximum point of the wave profile occurs when,
\(g_e-g_w=0\)
when the fluid particle acquired gravitational force cancels earth's gravity and continues to rotates into the direction of earth's gravity, downwards. When the fluid particle acquired gravitational force adds to earth's gravity, the fluid particle descends with greater acceleration than its ascendance.
\(g_{max,\,des}=g_w+g_e\)
As,
\(g_w+g_e\gt g_w-g_e\)
\(g_{max,\,des}\gt g_{max,\,asc}\)
This gives the characteristic short downward curve of the wave.
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Hot Air!
Hot air balloons,
A mix of cold and hot air on the left balloon creates lift, the balloon on the right where air is heated inside however, does not have lift. The balloon on the right is inflated but does not generate lift.
Still hot air.
Note: Yes, a floating body displaces its own weight and a submerged body experiences lift due to the pressure difference on the top and bottom effective areas. The question here is: why hot air has lift and rises? More importantly, how hot air acquire lift and rises? The shape of the inflated balloon is the result of hot air rising, not the cause of hot air rising and not the ultimate cause of the balloon rising.
A mix of cold and hot air on the left balloon creates lift, the balloon on the right where air is heated inside however, does not have lift. The balloon on the right is inflated but does not generate lift.
Still hot air.
Note: Yes, a floating body displaces its own weight and a submerged body experiences lift due to the pressure difference on the top and bottom effective areas. The question here is: why hot air has lift and rises? More importantly, how hot air acquire lift and rises? The shape of the inflated balloon is the result of hot air rising, not the cause of hot air rising and not the ultimate cause of the balloon rising.
Friday, October 16, 2015
Wind, Eddies, Vortices And Turbulence
This will model as a gas molecule,
a negative temperature particle in orbit around a positive temperature particle. This model will drop at higher than earth's gravity when pointing downwards, roll about, and be weightless when pointing upwards.
a negative temperature particle in orbit around a positive temperature particle. This model will drop at higher than earth's gravity when pointing downwards, roll about, and be weightless when pointing upwards.
Thursday, October 15, 2015
Hot Water Dripped Onto Cold Water
Hot water dripped onto cold water will vaporize immediately as positive temperature particles acquire negative temperature particle. The negative particle in orbit around the positive temperature particles, generates a gravitational field along its axis of rotation and acts against gravity. Hot water becomes a gas.
The same happens when hot water is poured out into the open at ambient \(-40^oC\), the steam observed is not water freezing immediately, but having acquired negative temperature particles, the hot water is weightless and drifts away like a mist.
Both experiments were posted on youtube.
Have a nice day.
The same happens when hot water is poured out into the open at ambient \(-40^oC\), the steam observed is not water freezing immediately, but having acquired negative temperature particles, the hot water is weightless and drifts away like a mist.
Both experiments were posted on youtube.
Have a nice day.
Gas Lots of Gas
In the gaseous state, it might seems that it is the spinning negative temperature particles which present a positive gravitational force directed along their axes of rotation that counter earth's gravity and enables the material to break free and fly off.
In this case, we would have assigned the signs of temperature particles wrong.
It is the positive temperature particles that attract a negative temperature particle to spin around them and so manifest a gravitational force that counteracts gravity. This turns the material into a gas. Since, temperature particles are discrete entity, it is possible that the material breaks away without passing through the liquid state on the acquisition of an negative temperature particle, Sublime.
A negative temperature particle spinning by itself, may generate enough gravitational force along its axis of spin to counter gravity. When this happens, at low temperature, the material also attains a gaseous state. The material evaporates away on the exposed surface. A sort of cold corrosion.
A fluid boiling, occurs at the fluid/container contact surface, and evaporation occurs on the surface of the fluid. Both occur where it is possible for positive temperature particles to attract negative temperature particles.
All these introduce a new factor in the transition to the gaseous state, the need to acquire negative temperature particles. These particles in orbit around positive temperature particles generates a positive gravitational field that counters earth's gravity.
Volar! jYo puedo volar!
In this case, we would have assigned the signs of temperature particles wrong.
It is the positive temperature particles that attract a negative temperature particle to spin around them and so manifest a gravitational force that counteracts gravity. This turns the material into a gas. Since, temperature particles are discrete entity, it is possible that the material breaks away without passing through the liquid state on the acquisition of an negative temperature particle, Sublime.
A negative temperature particle spinning by itself, may generate enough gravitational force along its axis of spin to counter gravity. When this happens, at low temperature, the material also attains a gaseous state. The material evaporates away on the exposed surface. A sort of cold corrosion.
A fluid boiling, occurs at the fluid/container contact surface, and evaporation occurs on the surface of the fluid. Both occur where it is possible for positive temperature particles to attract negative temperature particles.
All these introduce a new factor in the transition to the gaseous state, the need to acquire negative temperature particles. These particles in orbit around positive temperature particles generates a positive gravitational field that counters earth's gravity.
Volar! jYo puedo volar!
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
Why Melt? A Solid Is Magnetic
Oxygen \(O\), that exists as a gas, \(O_2\), at room temperature suggests the absence of negative gravity particles in spin that manifest a magnetic force that holds the material as a solid. Temperature particles (positive and negative particles) in spin present the electrostatic force or the gravitational force. Both these forces are weak and do not hold a material solid. And, as we extend the model to include many negative gravity particles, a resultant magnetic force is the result of an unbalanced spin among the spinning particles.
Statements more suitable in a religious context than science.
But none the less, this proposed effect of unbalance spinning negative gravity particle, is consistent with the fact that carbon \(C\) (less atomic mass but with unbalanced spinning negative gravity particles), is a solid but nitrogen \(N\) (more atomic mass but without unbalanced spinning negative gravity particles), is a gas, \(N_2\) at room temperature.
This conjuncture still allows for increasing atomic mass with increasing number of negative gravity particles across the Periodic Table, as we expect intuitively. So, it is wrong to say \(O\), has no gravity particles. It has mass! Instead, \(O_2\) has no unbalanced spinning negative gravity particles.
And it is the spins of negative gravity particles that matters. In the case of large cosmic spin, the presence of this magnetic field along the axis of rotation of negative gravity particles, collapses all magnetic material into a disc perpendicular to the axis of rotation.
Yes, I am building my very own, personal universe.
The introduction of positive temperature particles (heat) weakens a solid and at high enough temperature melts the solid, ie the melting point. The introduction of negative temperature particles (freeze) also weakens a solid and at low enough temperature causes it to fracture. We should call this temperature the fracturing point. The difference is: Positive temperature particles in spins manifest a electrostatic force that interacts with positive charges in the material and repels the material apart; at its melting point the material flows apart. Negative temperature particles on the other hand manifests a gravitation force in spins, this force however attracts the negative gravity particles in the material. The material hold firm at low temperature, but fractures. The force that holds a solid rigid is the magnetic force, "carried by" temperature particles and is weakened by the introduction of temperature particles into the material.
What of positive gravity particles?? Particles with gravity field lines pointing outwards??
mass \(\equiv\) negative gravity particles
positive gravity particles \(\equiv\) ??
Statements more suitable in a religious context than science.
But none the less, this proposed effect of unbalance spinning negative gravity particle, is consistent with the fact that carbon \(C\) (less atomic mass but with unbalanced spinning negative gravity particles), is a solid but nitrogen \(N\) (more atomic mass but without unbalanced spinning negative gravity particles), is a gas, \(N_2\) at room temperature.
This conjuncture still allows for increasing atomic mass with increasing number of negative gravity particles across the Periodic Table, as we expect intuitively. So, it is wrong to say \(O\), has no gravity particles. It has mass! Instead, \(O_2\) has no unbalanced spinning negative gravity particles.
And it is the spins of negative gravity particles that matters. In the case of large cosmic spin, the presence of this magnetic field along the axis of rotation of negative gravity particles, collapses all magnetic material into a disc perpendicular to the axis of rotation.
Yes, I am building my very own, personal universe.
The introduction of positive temperature particles (heat) weakens a solid and at high enough temperature melts the solid, ie the melting point. The introduction of negative temperature particles (freeze) also weakens a solid and at low enough temperature causes it to fracture. We should call this temperature the fracturing point. The difference is: Positive temperature particles in spins manifest a electrostatic force that interacts with positive charges in the material and repels the material apart; at its melting point the material flows apart. Negative temperature particles on the other hand manifests a gravitation force in spins, this force however attracts the negative gravity particles in the material. The material hold firm at low temperature, but fractures. The force that holds a solid rigid is the magnetic force, "carried by" temperature particles and is weakened by the introduction of temperature particles into the material.
What of positive gravity particles?? Particles with gravity field lines pointing outwards??
mass \(\equiv\) negative gravity particles
positive gravity particles \(\equiv\) ??
Monday, October 12, 2015
No Inner Electron Shells.
The manifestation of physical phases (solid, liquid, gas) of a material involved all interactions of the six basic particles (electron, protons, positive temperature, negative temperature,positive gravity and negative gravity .
The direct interactions of the particles are strong forces. The interaction of a particle and another in spin is a weaker force. The particle in spin or rotational motion manifest the orthogonal oscillating dimension. This force is along the axis of rotation and is highly directional. This force is reversed when the sense of the rotation reverses.
The interactions of spinning/rotating particles are the weakest force. This force reverses as the particles changes directions, is transient and may only be observable averaged over time and aggregated over many particles.
Water presents itself as magnetic because of the relative prominence of temperature particles. The molecular structure of water points that oxygen \(O\), is the key factor. This also suggests that, maybe, elements down a column in the periodic table with the same outer electron configuration have increasing numbers of temperature particles; that inner shell electrons do not exist!
As suggested previously in the post "Magnetism And Temperature Particles" dated 11 Jul 2015, to the relationship of magnetism and temperature particles, we add: an abundance of positive temperature particles made the element diamagnetic and an abundance of negative temperature particles made the element ferromagnetic. In between is paramagnetism due to the aligned rotations of the charged particles in the material. (When ferromagnetism and paramagnetism add negatively, we have anti-ferromagnetism)
Have a nice day.
The direct interactions of the particles are strong forces. The interaction of a particle and another in spin is a weaker force. The particle in spin or rotational motion manifest the orthogonal oscillating dimension. This force is along the axis of rotation and is highly directional. This force is reversed when the sense of the rotation reverses.
The interactions of spinning/rotating particles are the weakest force. This force reverses as the particles changes directions, is transient and may only be observable averaged over time and aggregated over many particles.
Water presents itself as magnetic because of the relative prominence of temperature particles. The molecular structure of water points that oxygen \(O\), is the key factor. This also suggests that, maybe, elements down a column in the periodic table with the same outer electron configuration have increasing numbers of temperature particles; that inner shell electrons do not exist!
As suggested previously in the post "Magnetism And Temperature Particles" dated 11 Jul 2015, to the relationship of magnetism and temperature particles, we add: an abundance of positive temperature particles made the element diamagnetic and an abundance of negative temperature particles made the element ferromagnetic. In between is paramagnetism due to the aligned rotations of the charged particles in the material. (When ferromagnetism and paramagnetism add negatively, we have anti-ferromagnetism)
Have a nice day.