From the post "Small Negative, Big Positive" dated 24 Dec 2017,
If \(a_{\psi\,c}\) is the complement negative particle, from the post "Sizing Them Up" dated 3 Dec 2014,
| \(a_{\psi_c}\) (nm) | \(f_c\) (GHz) | \(\lambda_c\)(nm) | \(a_{\psi\,\pi}\)(nm) | \(f_{\pi}\)(GHz) | \(\lambda_{\pi}\)(nm) |
| 19.34 | 2466067.5 | 121.57 |
|
|
|
| 16.32 | 2922728.6 | 102.57 |
|
|
|
| 15.48 | 3082568.8 | 97.25 |
|
|
|
| 14.77 | 3230699.3 | 92.79 |
|
|
|
| | | | | |
where the spectra lines are due to basic particles \(a_{\psi\,c}\), \(n=1\). And the size of big particles \({a_{\psi\,\pi}}\) are given by,
\(\cfrac{a_{\psi\,\pi}}{a_{\psi\,c}}=2.24921\)
and
\(2\pi a_{\psi}=\lambda\)
It was expected that \(a_{\psi\,c}\) are negative particles. But the value of \(2466067\,Hz\) suggests integer reduced micro wave frequency that agitates \(T^{+}\) particles. Based on this, \(a_{\psi}=19.34\,nm\) is a \(T^{+}\) particle. What gives?
Simple; an input of energy at reduce resonance frequency (by an integer divisor) imparts energy onto the particle; \(a_{\psi\,c}\), a negative temperature particle, grows into \(a_{\psi\,\pi}\), a positive temperature particle; the matter heats up.
end of quote from post "Small Negative, Big Positive" dated 24 Dec 2017.
What if spectral lines are due to big particles, \(a_{\psi_{\pi}}\) instead,
| \(a_{\psi_{\pi}}\) (nm) | \(f_{\pi}\) (GHz) | \(\lambda_{\pi}\)(nm) | \(a_{\psi\,c}\)(nm) | \(f_c\)(GHz) | \(\lambda_c\)(nm) |
| 19.34 | 2466067.5 | 121.57 | | | |
| 16.32 | 2922728.6 | 102.57 | | | |
| 15.48 | 3082568.8 | 97.25 | | | |
| 14.77 | 3230699.3 | 92.79 | | | |
where \(2\pi a_{\psi}=\lambda\) and \(a_{\psi\,c}=\cfrac{a_{\psi\,\pi}}{2.24921}\)
Then negative temperature particles are of even smaller size at \(8.599\,nm\) at a frequency \(5548995.4\,GHz\)...
This square wave frequency might cool down even further. Play it but not over the ears.
