As if the world economy is not disrupted enough...
If hydrogen, \(H\) is a pair of gravity particles with the negative particle in orbit around the positive particle. And the circular motion of this negative particle generates a positive electric field, \(+E\) that attracts an electron.
Then there can be alchemy, Newtonian style...
Such hydrogen then provides a source of gravity particles, together with heat as a source of temperature particles. It may be possible to bombard a light element nucleus with the positive particles and transmute it to a heavier element. In particular,
\(Cu\rightarrow Ag\rightarrow Au\rightarrow Rg\)
Wishful thinking...still the Lunar part of the Chinese New Year lingers, tic, tic, tic.
Friday, February 26, 2016
The Cooling Way
This is what would happen,
which would lead us to a new way of making ice. Two "would"s and an invitation to experiment. Have a nice day.
which would lead us to a new way of making ice. Two "would"s and an invitation to experiment. Have a nice day.
Tuesday, February 23, 2016
Going Separate Way
Since both positive temperature particles and negative gravity particles have a electrical potential energy component that manifest itself when the particles go into spin, it is then possible to separated the particle pairs by applying a negative electric potential around a conductor carrying positive and negative temperature particle pair and, positive and negative gravity particle pair.
Positive temperature particles escape as photons, leaving behind negative temperature particles. If these negative temperature particles are driven in a closed loop, in circular motion clockwise, they will generate a positive gravity potential, upwards. A lifting effect.
In retrospect, the lighting coil of a incandescent bulb is already using this mechanism to pry out positive temperature particles for luminescence.
A similar way to separate positive and negative gravity particles is also shown in the bottom figure above, where spinning negative gravity particles are diverted away from the main particle stream by a negative electric potential surrounding the center core conductor. The following is an illustrative diagram of two possible implementations.
Very little current should pass between the core and the surrounding conductor or coil. In the case of separating temperature particles, both conductors should be good conductor of heat, but at least one of them should be a bad conductor of electricity.
Have a nice day.
Positive temperature particles escape as photons, leaving behind negative temperature particles. If these negative temperature particles are driven in a closed loop, in circular motion clockwise, they will generate a positive gravity potential, upwards. A lifting effect.
In retrospect, the lighting coil of a incandescent bulb is already using this mechanism to pry out positive temperature particles for luminescence.
A similar way to separate positive and negative gravity particles is also shown in the bottom figure above, where spinning negative gravity particles are diverted away from the main particle stream by a negative electric potential surrounding the center core conductor. The following is an illustrative diagram of two possible implementations.
Very little current should pass between the core and the surrounding conductor or coil. In the case of separating temperature particles, both conductors should be good conductor of heat, but at least one of them should be a bad conductor of electricity.
Have a nice day.
Science And Disorder
Oh yes, science is otherwise schizophrenia; a closed, self-consistent system of deductions and derivations from a set of ''self-evident'' beliefs and axioms. And you are equally crazy. Science is an disorder only when you don't believe that you are crazy too.
I am better, I forget...
Does Electron Fall Under Gravity?
If the flight of a proton is a photon; a sustained flight that does not obey Lenz's Law (in effect the law of conservation of energy), then there can be two other positive particle radiations corresponding to positive temperature particles and positive gravitational particles.
Both are types of photons. But, to accelerate positive particles to light speed would suggest that they are mass-less. This is consistent with the derivation for force density, where a negative force density requires that the particle has some mass, and at the same time, positive particles have no mass.
Mass, \(m\), as the multiplicative constant to obtain weight, \(wt\), under gravity \(g\),
\(wt=mg\)
is fully determined and only determined by the presence of gravity particles.
At this point we extend our definition for mass to include charge mass, \(m_e\) inertia of a particle accelerated under the electric force and temperature mass, \(m_{\small{T}}\) inertia of a particle accelerated under the temperature field. Mass, \(m\) is redefined as \(m_{\small{G}}\), the gravitational mass/inertia in acceleration under gravity.
An electron then has \(m_e\) but not \(m_{\small{G}}\) nor \(m_{\small{T}}\). Electrons do not fall under gravity! Neither do temperature particles fall under gravity.
Both are types of photons. But, to accelerate positive particles to light speed would suggest that they are mass-less. This is consistent with the derivation for force density, where a negative force density requires that the particle has some mass, and at the same time, positive particles have no mass.
Mass, \(m\), as the multiplicative constant to obtain weight, \(wt\), under gravity \(g\),
\(wt=mg\)
is fully determined and only determined by the presence of gravity particles.
At this point we extend our definition for mass to include charge mass, \(m_e\) inertia of a particle accelerated under the electric force and temperature mass, \(m_{\small{T}}\) inertia of a particle accelerated under the temperature field. Mass, \(m\) is redefined as \(m_{\small{G}}\), the gravitational mass/inertia in acceleration under gravity.
An electron then has \(m_e\) but not \(m_{\small{G}}\) nor \(m_{\small{T}}\). Electrons do not fall under gravity! Neither do temperature particles fall under gravity.
Tempero-gravitational Wave
For completeness sake,
We have from Maxwell,
\(\nabla.E=\cfrac{\rho}{\varepsilon_o}\)
\(\nabla.B=0\)
\(\nabla\times E+\cfrac{\partial B}{\partial t}=0\)
\(\nabla\times B-\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{\partial E}{\partial t}=\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{J}{\varepsilon_o}\)
We have from Maxwell,
\(\nabla.E=\cfrac{\rho}{\varepsilon_o}\)
\(\nabla.B=0\)
\(\nabla\times E+\cfrac{\partial B}{\partial t}=0\)
\(\nabla\times B-\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{\partial E}{\partial t}=\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{J}{\varepsilon_o}\)
and so, analogously,
\(\nabla.T=\cfrac{\rho_{\small{T}}}{\varepsilon_{\small{To}}}\)
where \(T\) is the temperature force field strength per unit temperature particle (defined later in this post). \(\rho_{\small{T}}\), the negative temperature particle density enclosed inside the closed area for which \(\nabla.T\) is defined.
\(\nabla.G_W=0\)
where a gravitational field is produced by spinning negative temperature particles.
\(\nabla\times T+\cfrac{\partial G_W}{\partial t}=0\)
\(\nabla\times G_W-\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{\partial T}{\partial t}=\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{J_T}{\varepsilon_{\small{To}}}\)
where \(J_T\) is the negative temperature particle flow density.
Furthermore, \(\varepsilon_{\small{To}}\) is to be interpreted as the resistance to establishing a temperature force field in free space by a temperature particle, \(T_m\). Such a force field, experienced by other temperature particles, is spherical, centered at \(T_m\),
\(T=F_{\small{/T_m}}=\cfrac{T_m}{4\pi \varepsilon_{\small{To}}r^2}\)
per unit temperature particle. \(T\) is a Newtonian force per unit temperature particle \(T_m\), experienced by other temperature particle inside the temperature field. \(T\) by itself is no longer temperature but a vector quantity. It is possible to define a scalar potential field, \(T_s\), by defining zero potential at infinity (ie. \(r\rightarrow\infty\), \(T_s\rightarrow0\)); as just the derivations of electric and gravitational potentials.
We have a tempero-gravitational wave; a coupled pair of heat and gravitational energy; a wave oscillating between these two forms of energies; travelling at light speed \(c\).
Note: 宝莲灯; spinning negative temperature particles.
where \(J_T\) is the negative temperature particle flow density.
Furthermore, \(\varepsilon_{\small{To}}\) is to be interpreted as the resistance to establishing a temperature force field in free space by a temperature particle, \(T_m\). Such a force field, experienced by other temperature particles, is spherical, centered at \(T_m\),
\(T=F_{\small{/T_m}}=\cfrac{T_m}{4\pi \varepsilon_{\small{To}}r^2}\)
per unit temperature particle. \(T\) is a Newtonian force per unit temperature particle \(T_m\), experienced by other temperature particle inside the temperature field. \(T\) by itself is no longer temperature but a vector quantity. It is possible to define a scalar potential field, \(T_s\), by defining zero potential at infinity (ie. \(r\rightarrow\infty\), \(T_s\rightarrow0\)); as just the derivations of electric and gravitational potentials.
We have a tempero-gravitational wave; a coupled pair of heat and gravitational energy; a wave oscillating between these two forms of energies; travelling at light speed \(c\).
Note: 宝莲灯; spinning negative temperature particles.
Saturday, February 20, 2016
Einstein's Gravitational Waves, Maxwell's ElectroMagnetic Waves And Me
By oscillating electrons in a conductor, we generate electromagnetic waves,
From Maxwell,
\(\nabla.E=\cfrac{\rho}{\varepsilon_o}\)
\(\nabla.B=0\)
\(\nabla\times E+\cfrac{\partial B}{\partial t}=0\)
\(\nabla\times B-\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{\partial E}{\partial t}=\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{J}{\varepsilon_o}\)
If negative gravity particle is as postulated,
In an analogous way, if we are able to oscillate negative gravity particles in an equivalent conductor, we will generate gravito-electric waves.
\(\nabla.G_W=\cfrac{\rho_g}{\varepsilon_{go}}\)
where \(G_W\) gravitational field, replaces \(E\) the electric field. \(\rho_g\) is the total negative gravity particle enclosed (expressed as mass density). And \(\varepsilon_{go}\) is equivalent to \(\varepsilon_{o}\) in free space.
\(\nabla.E=0\)
An \(E\) field due to the negative gravity particle spin replaces the \(B\) field due to electron spin.
\(\nabla\times G_W+\cfrac{\partial E}{\partial t}=0\)
\(\nabla\times E-\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{\partial G_W}{\partial t}=\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{J_g}{\varepsilon_{go}}\)
where \(J_g\) is the negative gravity particle flow density.
If we compare with Newton's expression for gravity, per unit mass,
\(F_{/m}=G\cfrac{m}{r^2}=4\pi G\cfrac{m}{4\pi r^2} \)
keeping in mind,
\(E=\cfrac{1}{\varepsilon_{o}}\cfrac{q}{4\pi r^2}\)
We can let,
\(\rho_g=\rho_m=\cfrac{m}{Volume\,\,enclosed}\)
\(4\pi G=\cfrac{1}{\varepsilon_{go}}\)
This is using the unmodified gravitational constant \(G\) for gravity.
Such gravito-electric waves can be detected by their varying electric component, just as EMW can also be detected by their varying magnetic field.
Have a nice day.
From Maxwell,
\(\nabla.E=\cfrac{\rho}{\varepsilon_o}\)
\(\nabla.B=0\)
\(\nabla\times E+\cfrac{\partial B}{\partial t}=0\)
\(\nabla\times B-\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{\partial E}{\partial t}=\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{J}{\varepsilon_o}\)
In an analogous way, if we are able to oscillate negative gravity particles in an equivalent conductor, we will generate gravito-electric waves.
\(\nabla.G_W=\cfrac{\rho_g}{\varepsilon_{go}}\)
where \(G_W\) gravitational field, replaces \(E\) the electric field. \(\rho_g\) is the total negative gravity particle enclosed (expressed as mass density). And \(\varepsilon_{go}\) is equivalent to \(\varepsilon_{o}\) in free space.
\(\nabla.E=0\)
An \(E\) field due to the negative gravity particle spin replaces the \(B\) field due to electron spin.
\(\nabla\times G_W+\cfrac{\partial E}{\partial t}=0\)
\(\nabla\times E-\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{\partial G_W}{\partial t}=\cfrac{1}{c^2}\cfrac{J_g}{\varepsilon_{go}}\)
where \(J_g\) is the negative gravity particle flow density.
If we compare with Newton's expression for gravity, per unit mass,
\(F_{/m}=G\cfrac{m}{r^2}=4\pi G\cfrac{m}{4\pi r^2} \)
keeping in mind,
\(E=\cfrac{1}{\varepsilon_{o}}\cfrac{q}{4\pi r^2}\)
We can let,
\(\rho_g=\rho_m=\cfrac{m}{Volume\,\,enclosed}\)
\(4\pi G=\cfrac{1}{\varepsilon_{go}}\)
This is using the unmodified gravitational constant \(G\) for gravity.
Such gravito-electric waves can be detected by their varying electric component, just as EMW can also be detected by their varying magnetic field.
Have a nice day.
Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Saturday, February 6, 2016
The Likes Of Hall Effects
This is how a transient field as the result of spinning negative particles around a positive nucleus might align and be detectable. A negative particle spinning around a positive nucleus and together revolve around another nucleus (positive or negative) in an elliptical orbit.
A positive field will be required to push the positive nucleus towards a flat surface of the containing material. This field can be along the direction of the transient field, perpendicular to the flat surface or be perpendicular to the transient field, parallel to the flat surface.
It is likely that the center particle about which the spinning pair revolves, is part of the solid lattice of the material. This requires that the lattice be sufficiently sparse to accommodate the revolving pair of particles.
Happy Lunar New Year! Go crazy.
A positive field will be required to push the positive nucleus towards a flat surface of the containing material. This field can be along the direction of the transient field, perpendicular to the flat surface or be perpendicular to the transient field, parallel to the flat surface.
It is likely that the center particle about which the spinning pair revolves, is part of the solid lattice of the material. This requires that the lattice be sufficiently sparse to accommodate the revolving pair of particles.
Happy Lunar New Year! Go crazy.